On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:39 PM, grarpamp
<grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
It could be faster if they just went RF.

But since you don't have a patent on that,
but you could, your next bet is to hit up all
the HFT firms, international finance, etc.
I'll take 5% for the nudge ;)
_-------------------------------

Jim Bell's comment:

In the movie, they were beat by exactly that: microwave towers.  
Ordinary quartz fibers have an index of refraction of about 1.42 at 1550 nanometer wavelength.
My isotope-modified fibers should have an index of refraction 5.6% smaller, so the signal should go 5.6% faster.
However, Starlink's system may beat both these systems, as it is low-earth-orbit.
The 'horizon' of a satellite with an altitude of about 1 million feet (200 miles) is about 1230 miles.
So, it is conceivable that such a satellite could be (temporarily) positioned between Kansas City and New York City to allow faster connection.  Alternatively, if Starlink's satellites had satellire-to-satellite communication, such connections might be more regular and not discontinuous.