On 9/1/14, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
... Not necessarily... he doesn't indicate being detained (per RS) and subsequently asked, so he has no obligation (in US) to respond in confirmation.
you don't have to be detained per Reasonable Suspicion for RS to apply. so if there was RS refusing to identify could get you arrested by itself. [0][1] i imagine you'd only discover you were detained if you tried to leave the premises? presumably the "use of bitcoin for anonymous pre-paid payments associated with other known criminal activity" or similar bullshit was bravely painted "reasonable". i am not a lawyer, of course, but this is my understanding of how one explained it to me. it also seems this guidance may be very state specific.
And unbelievably, he keeps on talking.
it went bad from there ... get their badges and names before identifying yourself. then let your very next words be "i demand legal counsel be present for any further inquiry." best regards, 0. "Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada" - http://supreme.justia.com/us/542/177/case.html 1. "Stop and identify statutes" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes