On 10/14/2016 11:11 AM, Razer wrote:
On 10/14/2016 09:45 AM, Mirimir wrote:
On 10/14/2016 09:57 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Oct 14, 2016 10:28 AM, "Razer" <rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
Sound like information suppression to me... Jacob Appelbaum is a 'public
person' and subject to conversation, and he expects it. Don't like it?
Don't read it.
Razer, I love Jake and he knows it very well. I was just trying to stop your creepy public threats, which were completely off topic and very bizarre.
Please, if you want to talk about Jake, talk about him,not about me, Razer. Weirdo psycho, aff...
Yeah. As I said, it's just not honorable to disclose private communications. Or even privileged information obtained through private communications. I learned that as a drug dealer. As an activist. When I started using the Internet. As a sovereign individual.
This discussion happens on the street a LOT you know.
There's people who talk about people for the sake of influence peddling and just talking smack.
Then there are people who talk about people when the people they're discussing it with, typically friends, ARE IN DANGER OR POTENTIALLY THREATENED due to the person being discussed.
Dude, this is just a fucking public mail list. Tone down the drama!
Police Snitching and careless talk/influence peddling people get stitches.
Sharing important intelligence with comrades does not seem to have that effect. You wouldn't tell one of your drug dealing comrades you suspected someone was a narc? If not, Why? More biz for you while the other dealer's sitting in jail perhaps?
I might share such information privately, if it seemed warranted. But I wouldn't do so via insecure channels. And for sure, I wouldn't discuss that stuff in public.
Rr
OK, you say, but what about leaking stuff? How is that not disclosing privileged information? For sure. But it's distinguishable. Leaking is honorable when the subject is powerful, and is using their power to injure the innocent.
PSychological trolling injures the innocent.
Let's say, for giggles because it isn't the case, that I had just ended a relationship and was feeling depressed and not interested in someone else's advances, and I was receiving mail like that?
Innocent and injured. Perhaps driven to suicide eh?
Posting private messages in public, without
explicit permission, does not constitute leaking. It is dishonorable, and it demonstrates that the perpetrator cannot be trusted.
Just sayin'.
Someone sending unsolicited emails, especially when they're requested to desist is "dishonorable and it demonstrates that the perpetrator cannot be trusted."
Rr
Ps. You said you were a drug dealer. You never learned "Don't Trust ANYONE"? How DID you survive? Must have been a pretty middle class circle.