9 Jun
2016
9 Jun
'16
4:20 p.m.
On 6/9/16, Dan White <dwhite@olp.net> wrote:
Its an optional extension, and a privacy violating one, with a long list of MUST NOTs, in deference to actual CAPABILITYs, thus ignored this pointless rfc from list of standard rfc's. I'll submit my own bugs and pass on stats.