On 01/11/2017 07:52 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 01/11/2017 08:08 AM, Razer wrote:
On 01/10/2017 09:58 PM, [some random racist] wrote:
I, and Darwin, have studied human evolution extensively and deeply. Charles Darwin would spit o you for cherry-picking what he wrote.
Yes, there's that.
But also, he was also probably a racist. Given the cultural context, I mean. And in any case, he truly did know next to nothing about human evolution. Nobody did, then. So he was just bullshitting. Maybe trying to ingratiate himself to the religiously racist establishment.
Anyway, quoting him selectively about human evolution makes about as much sense as quoting him about plate tectonics. He was a geologist, after all. Or quoting Ludwig Boltzmann about design of gas turbines.
Darwin is so taken out of context and disabused. For instance he DID define who 'the fittest' were. Not the strongest or most ruthless. Those who cooperate the best. admittedly that's a psychopathic strong-point. Even if they don't have the same goals they're masters of the 'temporary alliance' (the "B" of the ABCs of psychopathy, no "Bonds"). He also used the word "Love" a lot. Something that psychopaths don't do so well. Rr Ps. I think this is whatsisname who was posting long diatribes a while back Can't place the handle.