On 10/12/20, Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:
Stefan Claas wrote:
| Stefan, I got: | AgAAAHYwSAAAAO+xQIT5meBNroABRxnwz1nF8Apub/z5OiqCftZUpGTBbcejwe6XQF4lpAnhW9YG | NAl9/zdLkj8FOG2NQmhbx82HXJv1Ju2c1w== | from you. Is this the same encrypted message as the one you sent? I'm expecting that it is.
AgAAAHYwjgEAACeQYcUutIj71LXOwf6SZU3wiTMAhlKBNAw552GqDynQ4nKtGX2l+5beCjexTFSW +MTj6dbJhjfTVpRzalwY19NSWrjeFZpy3WLi78oz3Yh/Tt7tLI630KJUO5vlAOqLM8IJmV4//ZeG 2AQgpofe61FXDm8H/SXRNFGD9K3Y/sIwtFbzGgyNJxEMIILTtkGCuWvr3Ub6nS06m4PuwP4Eeu0a ObmohUDGnXNuKEiULvyBbP2X05+s5ogXrzN5lh3pAW3q345kWDteqvqdS3o6baVTYthEb63m5dRg vIPIeto8v0ZBqJ9zZqIGPKlthQ9u0TXHR4xrdUUWKVxZfyOP906PPSmmoc10zQtWR3Bw9rZ3ym9Y HxXSu8YvnvGqH+IHzn4qYZYh+WywfcNwoygyNVKuswXDSbz1okDq0yMixIoi6at5ZHCJZDmu9KJx +LwUQWw7FYR9u2TqFsb+/w8snk9SI8gBTQW4jDoDDbGYYySDQqJA4SOhATwEMRuBySZEQbJ+qtlv zpPl4upnvipG
BTW. NaClbox messages are authenticated, so no one can send you a message in my name, if they are not in possession of my private key. This avoids then also to use signatures, like with GnuPG.
And the IMHO cool thing about NaClbox is that it is much easier to use and learn than GnuPG.
Why do you not use naclbox to communicate all the time? Couldn't it even be used for the cypherpunks mailing list, if the mailing list had a shared receiving private key, to verify that each person is saying what they intend? k's thinkpad, tor source folder, c72e81da09e333bc8804205bcfcf3bd8821cad61ad862d57114339e5ee00a664