On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:06:51 -0500 Snehan Kekre <snehan.kekre612@protonmail.ch> wrote:
I still have no definite idea as to why TrueCrypt was dropped and Bitlocker was suggested!
Because whoever suggested it trusted closed source Microsoft. Not that anything running from or on top of that OS should ever be considered secure.
I too think that Vera looks like a fork of TrueCrypt. https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=FAQ
What's the difference between TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt? ... Who knows if that's really true, tho.
I'd agree those are bullshit FAQ words in general. Has any project truly surfaced as the [technical] community recognized sucessor or comparable to TrueCrypt yet? Or are we still in fork of the month club mode?