That AI chat-bot answered this question in broad brush strokes https://twitter.com/AltcoinPsycho/status/1598742302050357248/photo/1 When gaseous chatbots attack Attacking large exchanges simultaneously requires a lot of people and/or resources at the level of a nation-state. Gaseous chatbots currently don’t have access to either or both. Then there’s the potential for leaks, blowback and payback. When gaseous chatbots attack ( 2 ) Organizing govt regulation and punishment-through-process contradicts 1) to a greater or larger degree depending and also requires large investments, long lead times and increased resources for oppressive policing agencies. And as Goldfinger observed to Bond about his 008 successor, " I trust he will be more successful ". When gaseous chatbots attack ( 3 ) Using your influence and contacts to spread knowingly false information may be justified in some extreme circumstances. I suggest such circumstances don’t exist for crypto-currencies yet, without child-abuse factoring in. Trading in disinformation also risks reputation capital. This is hard won and easily lost. It also clashes with both 1) and 2) I see a list of tactics so far - no coherent strategy - and no provable logistics supply. Nonsense on stilts. When gaseous chatbots attack ( 4 ) Persuading large corporate entities to shun crypto sounds like herding cats. But knock yourself out. Maybe the IMF and USG will label us an existential threat - again. On what basis is this shunning even justified - where are the Four Horsemen of the Infopocalypse? When gaseous chatbots attack ( 5 ) When so many thousands of crypto-currencies now exist, slowing or even stopping any new ones coming in could actually do the sector a favor. Much as established coins are increasing their very public burning-off activities. Do your worst, gasbag - we’ll do our best.