On November 6, 2019 7:20:43 AM UTC, "Punk - Stasi 2.0" <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:49:13 +0000 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
theory is
a result of observations of our expanding,
Expanding? So where's the center of the universe, the place where the 'big bang' started?
I notice you ignored the question. So again, where's the center of the universe.
Within our light cone, I don't think the universe has a center, per se. I don't really remember, and im tired ;)
Shulgin is probably my favorite chemist, but he's not a physicist ;)
Neither are you. On the other hand, shulgin was no doubt a 'scientist'...Then again, I'm just playing your recourse-to-authority game.
Lol, neither are you! It's my game now that I point out your authority isn't a fucking "authority" ?
But I don't need to invoke shulgin's credentials. What he said stands by itself. The big bang is absurd, creationist bullshit.
Repeating something over and over doesn't make it any more true :)
There are other models, but at minimum it's an extraordinarily useful scientific model.
how is the big bang tale 'useful'?
There's a difference between a 'tale' and a scientific model .
2nd question you didn't answer eh =)
I figured you could catch the implied answer. It's useful for research, for knowledge. As opposed to a 'tale' , which is useful for different reasons.
He was a European Jew - so the fuck what? So were however many millions that died in the Holocaust.
....the hell has the so called 'holocaust' got to do with anything?
Nothing, just like Einstein's ethnicity has fuck all to do with his work. That's my point.
except it does. or at least, part of it is in line with jew-kristian european creationist bullshit. The 'theory' comes from a catholic clown based on bullshit from a 'secular' jew.
Except, it doesn't. It's got fuck all to do with religion.
So now you are saying, what, relativity is bullshit too? Lol.
Newtonian physics don't keep satellites rotating around the earth,
eh?
You cut part of your own quote out, where you called some of Einstein's shit absurd.
they don't do shit really, if you care about accuracy.
You should ask what sort of questions can 'science' answer? Mechanics for instance can tell you how bodies move, but it can't tell you how they were 'created' or where they come from.
Heavy atoms (heavier than hydrogen & helium) are forged in the hearts of stars. Stars and planets form from the accretion of matter, due to gravity.
Where did the shit all ORIGINALLY come from? I don't know, but the big bang is at the very least a useful model.
Again, how is it 'useful'. Ah you mean, it allows governmetn parasites from academia to steal millions per year doing useless 'research'. Well, it's certainly 'useful' in that utilitarian sense...like stolen money is 'useful' to thieves.
Knowledge is useful in and of itself, by whatever dirty means it may be acquired. I don't find academia quite so pointless as you, although I can see your point. Thats it from me. Bed, and work tomorrow. Cheers John