Debunking GovBankCorp's and Enviro's screeching nonsense Anti-Crypto FUD... Strategy of Anti-Crypto's is not just ban, but to undermine and FUD the real cryptos, thereby shifting adoption toward and onto trash coins... non-private, censorable, regulated, CBDC's, etc... all no different than Fiat garbage... Anti-PoW is just their latest FUD campaign to do that. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/09-2022-Crypto-Assets-... https://batcoinz.com/quantifying-the-impact-of-using-stranded-methane-on-the... https://batcoinz.com/how-carbon-negative-are-different-ways-of-combusting-at... https://www.trilliumenergy.com/en/news/archive/2020/march/how-can-renewable-... https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/methane-capturer-vespene-energy-raises-%244.... https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/turning-garbage-into-bitcoin https://www.iea.org/reports/flaring-emissions When the energy source is coal, more consumption = worse environmental impact When its renewable: more consumption = neutral impact (+ve 'cos it displaces ff) When it's carbon negative, more consumption = good for the environment https://twitter.com/DSBatten/status/1570628846537568257 It all makes sense Why the founder left Greenpeace: "The peace seemed to have faded away - only the green part mattered" "Science and logic no longer held sway. Sensationalism, misinformation and fear were what we used to promote our campaigns" Patrick Moore: Why I Left Greenpeace https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRlYHF9Bqps Patrick Moore explains why he helped to create Greenpeace, and why he decided to leave it. What began as a mission to improve the environment for the sake of... "When you're analysing which chemicals to ban, you need to know some science" Similarly, when you're analysing which blockchains to ban, you need to know some science I thought @Greenpeaceusa would care about science & data. Their change the code campaign shows they don't