On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Razer <rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: Reposting email clearly intended to be private
Spam mail is intended to be private too. So I shouldn't pass that info on to a sysadmin or other person who might be spammed due to, let's say, hijacked address book?
IOW You ARE NOT MAKING A VALID POINT!
I did not request the emails, I did not originate the conversations at any point. I attempted to SEVERELY DISSUADE THE PERSON from sending them. Suicide threats from someone I don't know?
Fuck that. Go kill yourself. There are people trying desperately to live and dying for no good reason and I'm going to worry about unsolicited suicide notes from someone I don't even know?
Maybe I should feel sorry for that esquire from Nigeria who wants to deposit money in my bank account because he's being hounded by his government too?
Your idea of "Private" is perverse and dysfunctional. "She" ('her' recent spew before subsiding was very masculine in nature) has been sending this garbage to a few other UNWILLING RECIPIENTS whose emails
None of these other UNWILLING RECIPIENTS has seen fit to broadcast a private message over and over.
she only knows because this list is so fucking unsecured it passes your
So "unsecured" ? How do you suggest the list be "secured"? John
email on to... whomever. Spam email harvesters etc.
I've violated NO ONE'S privacy.
Hugs and kisses... I'd like to be in your lap right now...
Crap.
Rr