Wheedling about crypto and Snowden diverts from CIA Director's full
speech and broader critique. CIA version omits Q&A.
http://csis.org/files/attachments/151116_GSF_OpeningSession.pdf
To be sure, commentators must promote their products to flatter their
consumers as do spies, officials and
armaments (crypto) producers.
Officials buy the armaments to gain votes and post-service directorships,
word artists blow wind to fan the flames.
"This Is War!" Perfect for all consumers except the
slaughtered, a few of which get ritual mourning (most ignored,
unreported, unsacrelized, unheroricized, unencrypted).
Hard to tell the difference between opportunistic warmongerers or
anti-warmongerers, so ying and yang in complicity.
At 10:03 AM 11/17/2015, you wrote:
1.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/11/paris_attacks_b.html
2.
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/15/exploiting-emotions-about-paris-to-blame-snowden-distract-from-actual-culprits-who-empowered-isis/
<<As Paris reels from terrorist attacks that have claimed at least
128 lives, fierce blame for the carnage is being directed toward American
whistleblower Edward Snowden and the spread of strong encryption
catalyzed by his actions. Now the Paris attacks are being used an excuse
to demand back doors>>
<<how can “officials” and their media stenographers persist in
trying to convince people of such a blatant, easily disproven falsehood:
namely, that Terrorists learned to hide their communications from
Snowden’s revelations? They do it because of how many benefits there
are from swindling people to believe this. To begin with, U.S officials
are eager here to demonize far more than just Snowden
They want to demonize encryption generally as well as any companies that
offer it. Indeed, as these media accounts show, they’ve been trying for
two decades to equate the use of encryption anything that keeps them
out of people’s private onlinee communications with aiding and
abetting The Terrorists>>
<<Above all, there’s the desperation to prevent people from
asking how and why ISIS was able to spring up seemingly out of nowhere
and be so powerful, able to blow up a Russian passenger plane, a market
in Beirut, and the streets of Paris in a single week. That’s the one
question Western officials are most desperate not to be asked, so
directing people’s ire to Edward Snowden and strong encryption is
beneficial in the extreme>>
<<There’s the related question of how ISIS has become so
well-armed and powerful. There are many causes, but a leading one is the
role played by the U.S. and its “allies in the region” (i.e., Gulf
tyrannies) in arming them>>