This is why I've long been an advocate of total disclosure. I think
the document holders should publish everything they have. After they
do that, they could continue to 'leak release' documents with detailed
explanations for those who are too lazy or too confused by the
documents to sift through them and read them but having a document
dump out there would make the process of disclosure /much/ faster.
>The problem is that the general public is very slow to learn. Every step along the way even the wise said things >like "OH! The NSA said A, but they'll never say B!". Then two weeks later the docs show that B has not just >been said, it'd been SCREAMED. Then the word is "But they'll never say C!". Etc. Maybe at some point >people will pick it up differently.
>It also fits the media format better to drip info. A new news article every new drip. That makes for a lot more >exposure.
If they are going to 'drip, drip, drip' it, they should release it all first in hashed form, so that:
1. We ultimately know we get it all.
2. We know it hasn't been modified from the form it was originally in.