7 Mar
2014
7 Mar
'14
1:37 a.m.
I am in agreement with Dan re: it being a gov't op vs 'thief'. That was my first thought when the story broke, and nothing I've seen or heard since has changed my opinion. -Shelley On Mar 6, 2014 5:33 PM, dan@geer.org <dan@geer.org> wrote: So, Jim (et al.), you say "thief" w.r.t. Bitcoin. What odds do you give that the theft was a state-level op to derail the Bitcoin economy, i.e., that making money was not the object, rather, let's imagine, that this op hedges the vulnerability of fiat currency to disintermediation. --dan