On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:26:51 -0400 Michael Best <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
In summary, I showed that the information on the slide could have been mocked up, depsite matching the logs for Cryptome.org.
Supposing it was true that you proved that *maybe* the slide isn't authentic, what then? Are you trying to make a more general point? Amd that point is...?
Cryptome has denied the accuracy of my data, while oddly accusing me of stealing the data, and leaves me with no alternatives to posting the data online for others to review and verify.
The data came from Cryptome itself, on a pair of USBs they mailed to me <https://archive.org/details/cryptome-archive> https://archive.org/details/cryptome-archive. Within those USBs were server logs that include user IPs (spanning several months), .htaccess files, and a pwd file. After finding the data in the USB Cryptome had just sent me, I sent an email attempting to verify it hadn't been included as something extra that was not for public distrubition: