https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Assassination_market Talk:Assassination market
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. Proposed deletion This page was proposed for deletion by Bigdaddy1981 (talk · contribs) on 13 June 2009. It was contested by Colonel Warden (talk · contribs) on 2009-06-19 WikiProject Council This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Death (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance) WikiProject Crime (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance) WikiProject Internet (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance) Contents
1 Melodramatic opinion 2 Missing sources? 3 Issues 4 The discussion is not quite historically correct 5 Needs Revision 6 Sloppy thinking 6.1 Vote 7 Trillion dollar hit 8 Unclear Writing 9 Al Qaeda 10 Jim Bell mention missing? 11 "Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" 12 Online marketplace has closed 13 Identical to Agatha Christie Book 14 Assassination market cashed out 15 List of murders ordered via markets Melodramatic opinion Resolved – Objectionable passage deleted, per WP:NOR/WP:NPOV/WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. The final sentence of the article, "If the concept is taken up as civil disobedience as suggested by Jim Bell then this could easily lead to the end of all open and above ground government anywhere on earth," seems a bit too apocalyptic for a serious encyclopedia. this is kind of intense, but given the sophistication of Al Qaeda etc., I am quite sure we are not telling them anything here they don't already know... Missing sources? Resolved – Not missing. Interestingly, much of the material describing this stuff is no longer on the open web... This isn't true really. Large proportions of the very early cypherpunks archives are on the web. [1] This topic was discussed there heavily 1993 onwards. The ideas are all covered at a broad level in Cyphernomicon and Bell's Assassination politics articles. Among other archive sites of CP materials, and of course archive.org. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 08:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] Issues Resolved – Long since fixed. The "Jim Bell" link to zolatimes redirects to another location which yields 404 "File not found". The final sentence of the third paragrpah is incomplete. It ends "it is substantially more difficult to assign criminal liability for the action(s)." Substantially more difficult than what? Dominus 14:50 Mar 12, 2003 (UTC) The discussion is not quite historically correct Tim May had already discussed the idea of cryptographic protocols enabling the existence of abhorrent markets (such as assassination markets) before Jim Bell's "Assassination Politics" post (which was intially to the cypherpunks mailing list, iirc. I personally recall seeing such discussion in the extropians mailing list ~1993-1994 and on cypherpunks in 1994. Tim May is easily discovered on Usenet, so finding his email address is simple. I recommend contacting him for his version of events. This discussion is peurile imo because Jim Bell is misrepresented and unable to defend himself.Jim was the first to bring out the great libertory and freeing effects that assassination politics would bring to the world. Quite the opposite tack to the neo-nazi Tim Mays ' abhorrent' markets. Jims conception was less of a market and more of a mass movement of civil disobedience and he is quite explicit about that toward the end of his ten page essay. Jim was investigated, charged and is serving hard time today whereas no one knows where the neo-nazi Tim May is and no one cares. Jim Bell was arrested and charged while at the same time the pentagon was stealing the concept and renaming it ' Policy analysis markets.' Shades of the infamous theft of PROMIS software from the INSLAW company.From my reading of the cypherpunks list it peaked with the genius, Jim Bells contributions circa 1996-7 and then declined rapidly under the flaming racist meglomania of the neo-nazi Tim May. Stuff about Jim is stored at Cryptome inc trial testimony and he should be released in 2010, a prophet without honor in his own land and in his own time, Jim Bell is a latter day Martin Luther King and assassination politics is the death warrant for all governments. Last time I checked, Martin Luther King didn't tell people to kill people. Jim Bell did not write his Assassination Politics essay in 1997. It was begun in early 1995, and various chapters were written over the next year+. (One chapter was not written by Jim Bell: It was written by a journalist, writing for Asahi Evening News, in reaction to Bell's essay: Bell chose to include it in the AP essay because it was well-written and entertaining.) Finally, Jim Bell is no longer in prison, having been released March 12, 2012. If he hadn't been released, this paragraph would not have appeared. Jamesdbell8 (talk) 04:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Needs Revision The article says: the assassination of major figures such as Saddam Hussein would have an immediate impact--very profitable for anyone anticipating it. With the capture and imprisonment of Saddam Hussein, this remark appears to be obsolete. -- Dominus 16:19, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC) I changed Hussein to King Fahd of Saudi Arabia - that seems to solve the problem raised above, and also probably constitutes a better example than Hussein, because even before his capture Iraq's participation in world oil markets was highly restricted, whereas Saudi Arabia is a massive force in oil, and so the assassination of King Fahd would likely have even greater effect. Sloppy thinking There are two concepts of assassination markets that are used in this entry, and they are quite different. They are horribly mixed up in this article. The first is that of a futures exchange where you can (anonymously or not) speculate on the assassination of a certain individual on a certain date. This is similar to the Policy Analysis Market that were suggested and that are highly discredited by now. The second is that of assassins, who themselves (or their peers) profit financially from the assassinations they carry out through bets in financial markets. This is not an 'assassination market'. It is just insider trading in well-established markets. My suggestion is to just merge this into Prediction market - and keep it there as a footnote - DocendoDiscimus 18:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply] Vote Against! I dont agree with you. This article should be kept as a separate part. It concerns the theory about assasination markets as proposed by Jim Bell (or whatever his name is) both as a conspiracy theory and as he (Tim) thought about it. Also, and this is equally important as the first argument, it considers what impact cryptography mixed with capitalism/crypto-anarchism (onion routing esp.) has on society. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.11.232.248 (talk • contribs) 21 July 2006. Oppose You seem to misunderstand the concept; the prediction market is what provides the incentive for the assassins to operate, thereby instead of being a mere futures exchange, the prediction market in effect becomes somewhere to commission assassinations on a given date. Skomorokh incite 11:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply] Against! Historically it has been called assassination markets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.32.81 (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply] Trillion dollar hit The article seems to imply that Al Qaeda traders made a trillion dollars on shorting airline stocks after the 11 September attacks. As the NYSE total market cap is about $19.7 trillion I find it very hard to believe that any group could make 5% of this on one series of trades. I'm going to tone down this claim unless someone can come up with a reputable cite. Lisiate 01:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] I read at the time that there was Al Qaeda was suspected of manking about $200 million ”going a bear” on airline stocks; this money was probably more about raising fianances than an alternative justification for the act. Scott197827 22:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] I don't see how it could be read to even remotely imply that al-Qaeda made a trillion-dollar profit on 9/11...rather, it's simply referring to the severe decline that occurred on the stock markets that day (which may indeed have decreased the NYSE's total market cap by a trillion dollars) Kurt Weber 15:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply] Unclear Writing "Certainly the expensive investigations, arrests and prosecutions of Jim Bell, Carl Johnson and Matt Taylor were not theoretical. Were enough activists to join them then the entire process of repression would have to be seriously compromised. And this 'denial of service' attack from the net would work with even more synergy if following on from any external and directly physical attack. This threat to the state is verifiable. The threat is real - albeit virtual - because first responders would be distracted." What's going on in this paragraph here? It sounds like it was written by Charlie Brown's teacher. 154.20.115.35 (talk) 06:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply] Al Qaeda If somebody wants a ref to the Al Qaeda debate, here it is, [2] - dont know why it has been deleted from the original version of the article. Power.corrupts (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Er, no. That is a computer-generated book taking its information from... Wikipedia. Bit circular. Fences&Windows 21:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Jim Bell mention missing? I don't have time to look for it right now, but it seems as if this article is missing something. I came here after seeing the discussion on Jim Bell's page, but Bell isn't even mentioned on this page. The only mention is in the final paragraph... "He began an initiative called Operation Soft Drill — a term which reporter Declan McCullagh wrote was created by Bell — with the stated intention of intimidating police and corporate polluters into respecting human rights." It looks like an earlier reference to Bell was removed, leaving only this passing mention. I'm not familiar with the article myself, and I'm heading out for a while, but I thought I'd mention it for some of the editors who are more familiar with the article. Thanks in advance. Dayewalker (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] I put Bell back in, though he did not originate any of the terms in question. The text before my re-adding edits was senseless, since it referred to both "Bell" and "assassination politics" in totally non-sequiturial ways. I just added some Bell stuff from scratch, without reference to earlier versions of the article. Someone or other is POV-warring on this article to remove any mention of Bell, and that cannot stand. But maybe earlier versions were objectionable in some way(s). I'm not friend or fan of Bell (nor his enemy), but he unquestionably played a very major role in this issue. Frankly, he scared the hell out of a lot of people, more so than May (Denning notwithstanding), since May wasn't too detailed, while Bell really wanted to implement this. NB: The fact that assassination futures (another term that should probably be added) are among the most scary-for-lotsa-people aspects of crypto-anarchism isn't really covered, and people like Dorothy Denning are not mentioend at all. Some stuff can probably be reworked from the main Crypto-anarchism article. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 08:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] I want to know about assassination-futures!!! Please add whatever you know about it! If you dont have sources, please just dump some hints here, and maybe I can dig it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.32.81 (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply] "Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" I've just replaced a reference that simply said the above (see this version of the article) with a 'citation needed' tag. I'm guessing this was a Tor URL - does anybody know? And does Wikipedia really not allow these? Let me know and I'll raise it elsewhere on Wikipedia if necessary, as being able to cite Tor sites would certainly be useful for articles like this! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply] I was linking to the URL of the assassination market-implementation itself. Wikipedia stopped me when I submitted, with the error message that the URL was blacklisted. Maybe its because its an assassination market. I do not like this policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.32.81 (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply] Ah, I see. This article and this Reddit thread led me to Wikipedia's spam blacklist, which seems to include *all* .onion URLs. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply] Here's a couple of additional discussions on the inclusion of .onion links. Seems that they're not allowed because of WP:ELNO#EL7, which lists "Sites that are inaccessible to a substantial number of users, such as sites that only work with a specific browser or in a specific country" under "Links normally to be avoided". Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:48, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply] @83.254.32.81 and Jonathandeamer: I am assured that official .onion links for pages will be whitelisted. See [3] and [4] (both of those links will eventually have to be redone/archiving) I am told the main concern is that they might be substituted with bogus links by unscrupulous editors. To be sure, I didn't get this link to work, but on the other hand, it seems impossible to be certain that it is down for good, even if taking the pot and closing shop sure seems like a smart move. In any case, I think we will eventually need to keep track of which Assassination Market we were talking about, since any idea this spectacularly bad never goes out of style. Wnt (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply] Online marketplace has closed Original research from myself has determined the site closed in June 2014 and that the money never moved since. Alas I am not a reliable source, but I am on the only one AFAIK. http://pirate.london/2015/11/whatever-happened-to-the-crowd-sourced-assassin... Deku-shrub (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply] It is relatively easy to verify that the monies has not been moved from the accounts. Wikipedia accepts references to public databases for example when referencing genetic sequences, publicly known mathematical constansts and whatnot, so it should be possible to reference the bitcoin blockchain too, right? Here is the transaction history and balance for the account dedicated to Bernanke assassination: blockchain.info page for the account. 2001:2002:51E3:8007:3AD5:47FF:FEB9:111D (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] Identical to Agatha Christie Book The terms of this website appear identical to the plot of an Agatha Christie book, the Pale Horse (1961). I wonder if this is relevant for the main page. Assassination market cashed out https://pirate.london/fake-blockchain-assassination-market-remembers-his-wal... Deku-shrub (talk) 18:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply] I updated it with RS https://harpers.org/archive/2020/01/click-here-to-kill-dark-web-hitman/ Zezen (talk) 14:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for that partial agreement. See the Pirate London site for more such cases (from the US) or details. Bows. Zezen (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] List of murders ordered via markets This https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47747357 apart from more famous ones. Zezen (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] That wasn't via a market Deku-shrub (talk) 19:11, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] BBC says it was: The documents seen by BBC Russian suggest the man who allegedly placed the order for the murder [on Hydra market], who goes by the pseudonym Miguel Morales, was being investigated by Lt Col Shishkina while other sources are much more specific. The first "Internet hitman requests", market-based or otherwise, date to 2004 and earlier: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2004/may/29/crime.uknews Zezen (talk) 14:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Fair, I had not read into that. None the less, that was arranged by a general purpose darknet market, not a murder-specific one Deku-shrub (talk) 15:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Categories: Stub-Class Death articles Low-importance Death articles Stub-Class Crime-related articles Mid-importance Crime-related articles WikiProject Crime articles Stub-Class Internet articles Low-importance Internet articles WikiProject Internet articles This page was last edited on 7 June 2022, at 23:17 (UTC). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Assassination_market&offset=&limit=500&action=history 7 June 2022 curprev 23:17, 7 June 2022 MalnadachBot talk contribs m 19,219 bytes +8 Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB 29 December 2019 curprev 04:34, 29 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 19,211 bytes +194 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 28 December 2019 curprev 15:02, 28 December 2019 Deku-shrub talk contribs 19,017 bytes +223 →List of murders ordered via markets undo curprev 14:29, 28 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 18,794 bytes +499 →List of murders ordered via markets undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor 25 December 2019 curprev 19:53, 25 December 2019 Deku-shrub talk contribs m 18,295 bytes +6 →Assassination market cashed out undo curprev 19:11, 25 December 2019 Deku-shrub talk contribs 18,289 bytes +120 →List of murders ordered via markets undo 24 December 2019 curprev 15:58, 24 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 18,169 bytes +205 →List of murders ordered via markets: new section undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit curprev 14:43, 24 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 17,964 bytes −1 →Assassination market cashed out: format undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit curprev 14:43, 24 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 17,965 bytes +175 →Assassination market cashed out: mv undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit curprev 14:42, 24 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 17,790 bytes −349 →Identical to Agatha Christie Book: misplaced undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit curprev 14:41, 24 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 18,139 bytes +176 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit curprev 14:40, 24 December 2019 Zezen talk contribs 17,963 bytes +173 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 8 October 2019 curprev 19:17, 8 October 2019 70.166.239.202 talk 17,790 bytes −1 →Missing stources? undo 14 April 2019 curprev 13:28, 14 April 2019 PkbwcgsBot talk contribs m 17,791 bytes 0 WPCleaner v2.01 - Task 17 - approved BRFA / WP:WCW project (Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links) undo 31 July 2018 curprev 18:11, 31 July 2018 Deku-shrub talk contribs 17,791 bytes +241 →Assassination market cashed out: new section undo 28 August 2017 curprev 16:45, 28 August 2017 Wnt talk contribs 17,550 bytes +336 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo curprev 16:43, 28 August 2017 Wnt talk contribs 17,214 bytes −1 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo curprev 16:43, 28 August 2017 Wnt talk contribs 17,215 bytes +671 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo 21 July 2017 curprev 22:46, 21 July 2017 Beorhast talk contribs 16,544 bytes +196 call out to an agatha christie book undo 20 July 2017 curprev 17:08, 20 July 2017 2001:2002:51e3:8007:3ad5:47ff:feb9:111d talk 16,348 bytes −129 →Online marketplace has closed undo curprev 17:06, 20 July 2017 SineBot talk contribs m 16,477 bytes +360 Signing comment by 2001:2002:51E3:8007:3AD5:47FF:FEB9:111D - "→Online marketplace has closed: " undo curprev 17:03, 20 July 2017 2001:2002:51e3:8007:3ad5:47ff:feb9:111d talk 16,117 bytes +476 →Online marketplace has closed undo 1 July 2016 curprev 00:21, 1 July 2016 MarnetteD talk contribs 15,641 bytes −1,153 →External links modified: rmv bot spam undo 31 March 2016 curprev 15:08, 31 March 2016 Cyberbot II talk contribs 16,794 bytes +1,153 Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot undo 19 February 2016 curprev 15:54, 19 February 2016 BattyBot talk contribs m 15,641 bytes +30 →top: talk page general fixes & other cleanup per WP:TPL using AWB (11894) undo 1 January 2016 curprev 22:33, 1 January 2016 Deku-shrub talk contribs 15,611 bytes +403 →Online marketplace has closed: new section undo 21 July 2015 curprev 23:46, 21 July 2015 Fixuture talk contribs 15,208 bytes +104 Assessment: +Crime: importance=Mid, class=Stub; +Internet: class=Stub, importance=Low (assisted) undo 12 June 2014 curprev 13:48, 12 June 2014 Magioladitis talk contribs m 15,104 bytes +4 talk page general fixes using AWB (10241) undo 13 December 2013 curprev 12:28, 13 December 2013 Magioladitis talk contribs m 15,100 bytes 0 Talk page general fixes using AWB (9784) undo 28 November 2013 curprev 18:48, 28 November 2013 Jonathan Deamer talk contribs 15,100 bytes +593 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo curprev 18:14, 28 November 2013 Jonathan Deamer talk contribs 14,507 bytes +419 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo curprev 18:12, 28 November 2013 SineBot talk contribs m 14,088 bytes +300 Signing comment by 83.254.32.81 - "→Sloppy thinking: " undo curprev 18:10, 28 November 2013 83.254.32.81 talk 13,788 bytes +67 →Sloppy thinking undo curprev 18:09, 28 November 2013 SineBot talk contribs m 13,721 bytes +300 Signing comment by 83.254.32.81 - "→Jim Bell mention missing?: " undo curprev 18:08, 28 November 2013 83.254.32.81 talk 13,421 bytes +173 →Jim Bell mention missing? undo curprev 18:05, 28 November 2013 SineBot talk contribs m 13,248 bytes +300 Signing comment by 83.254.32.81 - "→"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source": " undo curprev 18:04, 28 November 2013 83.254.32.81 talk 12,948 bytes +243 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo curprev 18:03, 28 November 2013 Jonathan Deamer talk contribs m 12,705 bytes +1 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source" undo curprev 17:52, 28 November 2013 Jonathan Deamer talk contribs 12,704 bytes +615 →"Wikipedia does not allow the URL of this source": new section undo 9 July 2012 curprev 21:07, 9 July 2012 Jamesdbell8 talk contribs 12,089 bytes −138 →The discussion is not quite historically correct undo 5 July 2012 curprev 04:03, 5 July 2012 Jamesdbell8 talk contribs 12,227 bytes +754 →The discussion is not quite historically correct undo 26 April 2011 curprev 22:56, 26 April 2011 Boneyard90 talk contribs 11,473 bytes +15 Evaluated importance for WP:Death undo 28 February 2011 curprev 08:06, 28 February 2011 SMcCandlish talk contribs 11,458 bytes +2,014 Misc. cleanup; someone please install ArticleHistory here to save space; →Jim Bell mention missing?: resolved? undo 6 April 2010 curprev 23:28, 6 April 2010 Dayewalker talk contribs 9,444 bytes +905 →Jim Bell mention missing?: new section undo 8 January 2010 curprev 01:58, 8 January 2010 Pollinosisss talk contribs 8,539 bytes +11 death project undo 2 January 2010 curprev 17:00, 2 January 2010 Pollinosisss talk contribs 8,528 bytes +22 death project undo 5 July 2009 curprev 00:07, 5 July 2009 Backslash Forwardslash talk contribs 8,506 bytes +104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination market closed as no consensus undo 25 June 2009 curprev 21:23, 25 June 2009 Fences and windows talk contribs 8,402 bytes +328 →Al Qaeda undo curprev 17:45, 25 June 2009 Power.corrupts talk contribs 8,074 bytes +340 →Al Qaeda: new section undo 22 June 2009 curprev 18:04, 22 June 2009 Beltline talk contribs 7,734 bytes +103 {{oldprodfull |nom = Bigdaddy1981 |nomdate = 2009-06-13 |con = Colonel Warden |condate = 2009-06-19 }} undo 19 June 2009 curprev 12:20, 19 June 2009 Colonel Warden talk contribs 7,631 bytes +20 + links to sources undo 5 December 2007 curprev 06:25, 5 December 2007 Phoenixrod talk contribs m 7,611 bytes +2 section heading, to make table of contents accurate undo curprev 06:06, 5 December 2007 154.20.115.35 talk 7,609 bytes +21 No edit summary undo curprev 06:04, 5 December 2007 154.20.115.35 talk 7,588 bytes +734 No edit summary undo 7 November 2007 curprev 11:49, 7 November 2007 Skomorokh talk contribs 6,854 bytes +450 →Sloppy thinking: the sloppy thinking is yours undo 28 June 2007 curprev 06:22, 28 June 2007 BetacommandBot talk contribs m 6,404 bytes +241 subst'ing templates per WP:SUBST undo 21 July 2006 curprev 18:46, 21 July 2006 Phoenixrod talk contribs 6,163 bytes +41 →Vote: unsigned comment undo curprev 16:04, 21 July 2006 193.11.232.248 talk 6,122 bytes +438 →Sloppy thinking undo 8 June 2006 curprev 15:39, 8 June 2006 80.177.165.144 talk 5,684 bytes +288 No edit summary undo 21 May 2006 curprev 15:30, 21 May 2006 Kmweber talk contribs 5,396 bytes +345 →Trillion dollar hit undo 21 March 2006 curprev 22:48, 21 March 2006 Scott197827 talk contribs 5,051 bytes +286 No edit summary undo 10 February 2006 curprev 01:40, 10 February 2006 Lisiate talk contribs m 4,765 bytes −1 →Trillion dollar hit= undo curprev 01:40, 10 February 2006 Lisiate talk contribs 4,766 bytes +443 Trillion Dollar Hit undo 26 September 2005 curprev 18:56, 26 September 2005 DocendoDiscimus talk contribs m 4,323 bytes +44 →Sloppy thinking undo curprev 18:54, 26 September 2005 DocendoDiscimus talk contribs 4,279 bytes +73 No edit summary undo curprev 18:54, 26 September 2005 DocendoDiscimus talk contribs 4,206 bytes +754 No edit summary undo 14 July 2005 curprev 04:14, 14 July 2005 69.142.219.239 talk 3,452 bytes +272 No edit summary undo 31 March 2005 curprev 04:20, 31 March 2005 128.135.192.80 talk 3,180 bytes +379 →Needs Revision undo 22 November 2004 curprev 16:19, 22 November 2004 Dominus talk contribs 2,801 bytes +319 Saddam Hussein remark obsolete undo 21 November 2004 curprev 00:15, 21 November 2004 24.194.36.16 talk 2,482 bytes +78 No edit summary undo 16 November 2004 curprev 02:48, 16 November 2004 203.164.184.80 talk 2,404 bytes +1,252 No edit summary undo 9 June 2004 curprev 22:23, 9 June 2004 80.177.165.144 talk 1,152 bytes +543 The discussion is not quite historically correct undo 12 March 2003 curprev 14:50, 12 March 2003 Dominus talk contribs 609 bytes +364 No edit summary undo 28 March 2002 curprev 20:23, 28 March 2002 24.150.61.63 talk m 245 bytes +245