On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:33:45 +0200 rysiek <rysiek@hackerspace.pl> wrote:
Dnia niedziela, 4 października 2015 16:08:55 Juan pisze:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 14:51:58 +0300
Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com> wrote:
1. How do you distribute goods (food, shelter, shiny J-Pads, money? etc)
free market
What is a sound definition of free market?
Georgi, if you are really interested in the topic, do your own homework.
But you do realise that there are different views on what a "truly free market" is, right?
Wrong. Did you even bother to skim the text I linked to?
Is it the one where is the least regulation?
There's no 'regulation' in a free market. Your question shows that you don't what a free market is.
Is that the one where the better offer always wins?
Better offer of what? A free market isn't defined by outcomes.
These are not necessarily the same, as cartels and monopolies strive in a "free market without regulation".
LMAO! Sure. Competition leads to monopoly and 'free' actually means regulated.
So, which is it for you? Tell me, and *then* I can do my research.
It's quite clear that you don't have a clue rysiek. FIRST you do your research about liberalism and THEN you try to come up with something that at least looks like criticism.
Being vague is a very good way to not go into a true discussion. If that's what you're after, good going. :)
I wasn't vague at all. Check the literature I linked. But you're right about something. I don't want to waste time with people who only have knee-jerk reactions and dismiss something they don't even know what it is.
(...)
In particular:
1. How does the ``free market'' prevents _cartels_ and stays free? 2. In a stateless free market, what happens to orphans, physically/mentally impaired people and the like?
They are sold as cat and dog food for the pets of the rich people.
Well, at least we're clear.
We've been clear all the time. I know that you don't have a clue and only parrot establishment propaganda.
IMHO realworld implementation of ``free market'' is the law of the jungle played with (virtual) money/goods on a Ponzi scheme playground (check the thread about the usa debt).
That is, you don't know what "free market" means and yet you are wasting time discussing it and apparently trying to refute something you don't have a clue about it.
So which version of the "free market" you propose? There are many.
Drop the bluffing rysiek. I know that you don't know what you're talking about.