On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:38 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
I stand by blockchain technologies that prevent the isolation of communities and provide immutable public records.
I don't see how immutable public records help freedom. Rather they sound like more surveillance.
Cryptography can make votes unalterable, dialogue unhidable.
you need to identify people to make 'votes unalterable' - the very opposite of anonimity.
I see you expressing some of the things you usually express. I don't believe your assumption here is true: you can make votes unalterable and not identify people. I'm not a cryptographer.
Math could show clear statistics of what influences behavior and information flow, and for whom.
but all those things are controlled by political power. 'information flow' is controlled by US corporations at a global scale for instance.
But computer programers share with you the malady that problems are for 'fixing'.
Personally, I have no idea how to communicate with people who refuse to harm anyone, to work on solutions with them.