Re: [spam][spam][spam] crazy

Thought Email List: recent cryptography thought From: small group of diverse inferencing we interacted with an inner critic and found that likely the “vulnerability” is already addressable. the reason is that there is likely a way to counter it by cryptographically mutating the source of randomness (as already inferred in countermeasures daydream part), and that it engages a very basic and old region of cryptography, so somebody would have studied and discerned that already. this was extra thinking from the inner critic. i think we already discerned that what could be charged is that most people would never had heard of whatever the countermeasures are and would be using a one-time pad naively. (i’m now “in trouble” for sharing this)