i am reminded of my visit to tesla in serbia his story tells a tail of defeat by the powers but his is not the only and final story rabbit hole: also to my knowledge his archive is there but the USG confiscated his US archive and it was freed in 2013 but i have not looked into that declasification from top secret ... to what i dont know... http://www.tesla-museum.org/meni_en/nt.php?link=arhiva/a&opc=sub5 http://www.teslasociety.com/archive.htm there are problems with the digitization process http://www.tesla-museum.org/meni_en/nt.php?link=arhiva/a&opc=sub5 some fbi files are linked here: http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_mispapers.html ## anyway the point of bringing it up is that in spite of the powers making structural decisions for the globe i still think it is possible to work around them and i am not sure this original post of johns is really that interesting to what point is he posting it? knowns? there is overall a harnessing of the structures in the minds of people meant to thwart development and all fronts need work to shift this out > from trash collecting to nasa stuffs i think catagorizing what is known is archival but our minds can engage more substantive constructs On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
there are mesh networks
freifunk
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=freifunk+berlin
also when people woke up to the cables of the net all going thru the US there was at least talk of making new infrastructure on other land masses
i wrote about the chatanooga model that freed the fiber under the city of chatanooga and also the future being wireless hubs not broadband ... look to what the powers are making frameworks for and develop outside that realm using its flaws
when i lived in syria i had video calls in the middle of the desert ... no cell towers in sight -
iraqis had video calling in 2000 or even 1999 - anyone that had an efficient fone (nokia was big)
in other words the whole system is throttled and thats not just about speed
but quantum computing development is being ignored ?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
Posting 'useful' (your definition) older emails like this I think is good.
4. The non-profit, open-source, volunteer internet providing services or products at no cost or for donations.
5. The closed sub-internets, mil-gov classified, SCADA, restricted and special purpose networks used by operators and administrators of backbones, nodes, satellite, cable, wired and wireless systems,
Second, the unknown internets, with or without evident access logging:
6. The covert policing and spying internet which watches, logs, mucks around, runs stings, causes accidents and shut-downs, cuts cables, runs surprise tests and attacks, and keeps alive the demand for covert oversight of all the known others.
7. The covert internets which hide among all the others, or try to subject to discovery by 6.
8. The evanescent internets which are set up, used and disappear quickly, openly or covertly, subject to 6.
9. The wayward and waylaid internets which cannot be identified: rogues, experiments, mistakes, erratic systems, unexpected glitches and consequences, acts of nature, forgotten protocols, inept code, destructive code, lost access techniques, death of the perpetrators.
10. Internets of combinations, hybrids, deceptions, ploys and warfare among 1-9.
We need a good name for the internet with these attributes: - not so ad-hoc - physical layer - localised/ immediate neighbourhood area mini-nets
- eventually (if useful) a meta network connecting these
Since in general we don't own our internet tubes, the mostly profit-motivated companies that do have ongoing economic incentive to centralize, control, be taken over by larger fish.
We need to grok a counter-principle, such that we can over the longer term reverse this trend.
This requires perhaps some perceivable benefit(s) to the local neighbours and their phy nodes, to warrant the hour or so required to connect to each other.
So where could such features/ benefits arise?: - some new dynamic of torrents? - local/ community "library" concept? - privacy? - anonymity?
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.