On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:39:47PM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
Hi everyone, Just touching base with the cypherpunk lists.
Indeed I am quite frustrated with the list, but who cares,
Well, various questions have been asked of you, and pathways for conversation suggested, by a few folks on the list, and only a few of these you have pursued. That is OK of course, it is your choice in which way you engage in communication with anyone. But when serious questions, suggestions and the like are put to you, and it looks like you don't answer, or don't attempt to answer deeply, then normal humans make natural assumptions e.g. "he is evasive" or "he is superficial".
I think this project deserves interest (like many other out there this is true), but at least I'd like to say I am alive and still evolving the project.
Last time I surfaced I was anpha-11, now I am compiling alpha-22; it's a long way to the top if you wanna rock'n roll.
I've post this in reddit, calling for alpha testers. https://www.reddit.com/r/US_Public_System/comments/gev3g7/looking_for_alpha_...
If you know about crypto and have explorer soul and you're so kind, please help me constructively to make this tech mainstream. It could pay off.
This is your "value proposition", which sounds (at least superficially) like an attempt to appeal to greed.
On other matters, how are you doing?, anyway, Thanks for your feedback, no matter negative or positive.
Best wishes and regards,
-- Other Arkitech
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
One suggestion you seem to have not properly tackled is your deep foundational motivations - so far, the best some of us could gather is "move government taxation to the blockchain" along with some vague notion that "there's a slightly better way to do taxation, and my project will facilitate that". That's a bit flimsy though. And it may have nothing to do with what you're about - but that would be whose job to clarify? Good luck,