On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 10:21:50PM -0500, Cari Machet wrote:
> Transition is a false dichotomy

Thank you - that's an interesting proposition.  I'm working on grokking this, will try to understand...


> Paper Money was invented in China and they soon realized it could be faked
> and banned it
>
> Life is a build
>
> The problem with bitcoin and blockchain is that the government can become
> that also but we cannot let that deter the process
>
> We build a new structure as they are taking on our old structure
>
> Everything is always at play not in stasis
>
> Anarchist rule ????? Wtvf anarchy is not about ruling and it’s so fucked up
> to write that please clear your conditioning ASAP

I guess my conditioning is more to the "anarchy = chaos" colloquial term ... yes, the "rule" of anarchy is no rules or "laws" whatsoever - just personal responsibility, private (party party) agreements.

I struggle to escape the looming fear that "real anarchy", due to the present, say average state of consciousness of humans, would descend into survival of the fittest - so perhaps this "anarchist rule" phrase comes from a fear of "being ruled by thugs", which, irony of ironies, is what we to a real degree suffer under in today's fake-democracies of course ...


I have much to work on internally (including fear), so really, thank you for the reminder!



> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 9:04 PM Zig the N.g <ziggerjoe@yandex.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:15:52AM +1000, Zig the N.g wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 03:29:14PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 3 May 2020 21:03:22 +1000
> > > > "Zig the N.g" <ziggerjoe@yandex.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > One of the ways to reinforce a nation against such predatory
> > oligarchical financial rule, is a state-run development bank,
> > > >
> > > >     fascist spam, like the rest of Z.g's spam
> > >
> > >
> > > It's a possible transition step, in the context of the existence of a
> > government, rather than anarchist rule.
> > >
> > > Another possible step is printing your own currency rather than
> > borrowing every dollar from private banks - JFK tried this, although it's
> > not overly dissimilar to creating a federal development bank which issues
> > its own "credit" - in Australia, this is even in our constitution at the
> > state level, although prior to the thieves at Bretton Woods, we also did
> > this with our Commonwealth Bank, and were thus the ONLY nation to come out
> > of World War II with ZERO debt.
> > >
> > > Funny how printing your own money means you don't anyone shit.
> >
> > "... you don't -owe- anyone shit."
> >
> >
> > Also, our real challenge is how to transition from the world we are
> > actually in - we cannot begin from utopia, although it may be useful to lay
> > out some of the parameters for your own version of utopia, as then we can
> > think clearly about how to transition from here, to there.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Rothschilds did not like that though, and so we Aussies were brought to
> > heel at Bretton Woods.
> > >
> > > The technical term for this is "shit show".
> >
> --
> <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
> cari machet
> about.me/carimachet
> <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>