On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 22:58:55 -0200 Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 4, 2016 9:04 PM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe you don't, but quinn, whom you are so thouroughly praising,
certainly does.
His convictions, not mine.
What is that supposed to mean? He is a shitbag, but according to you he is a great. YOU are the one who SIDES with a SHITBAG like quinn. It is YOUR problem. Do not take me for an idiot, Cecilia. You can't be 'anti-censorship' and pro-quinn who is a fucking CENSOR.
There's a rather big group of people who support censorship in
this very same list and as far as I can tell you never speak against it or them.
Please, search better in the list archives and verify my older messages. I already said it would _not_ be correct to moderate a cypherpunk list.
Thanks for making my point again. It's not just this list, but any medium. It is not correct to moderate anything. You should have just said that, but you didn't. As to you speaking against the many censors who advocate censorship here, feel free to link your posts criticizing them. I doubt there's any.
Furthermore, when the Tor Inc. pentagon nazis censored 'their'
list your reply was something like "I don't like it but it is their list" - so you DO support censorship.
I was kick-banned of Tor-Talk list and everybody knows I didn't like it at all.
Completely irrelevant like the rest of your soap-opera-like tirade, except for this "I respected their decision, because it is a Tor Project list and it follows their management rules. " "I am not saying their rules are right or fair, but Tor-Talk is one of their lists, Juan. Their list, their rules." So you are a fully fledged totalitarian who parrots the most stupid, right-wing slogan ever. Newsflash for you Cecilia!! It is not their list. If anything it is taxpayer owned. And they have no 'right' to make nor 'enforce' any 'rules'. Like I said Cecilia, you SUPPORT CENSORSHIP. Don't bother pretending that you don.t It was an unpleasent and pretty humiliating experience
because Boyce said I was doing "rape apology" when defending Jake to justify my expulsion.
I cried for days, in several moments hidden in the bathroom of the office, because I didn't want to tell to my co-workers what was happening. I didn't want more judgements about my past, my character, about my friend's life and more and more prejudice. I was deeply hurt and the false allegation of "rape apology" still hurts a lot until now.
Boyce and the other moderators, including the 'fake victims', knowed I was already raped twice and about my emotional and physical scars. It always will be impossible to me to do any kind of rape apology. I was just questioning all the lies and the bullying against Jake, against one of my friends, a person who I knowed in person and loved a lot.
I don't think my expulsion was fair or correct, but I respected their decision, because it is a Tor Project list and it follows their management rules. I am not saying their rules are right or fair, but Tor-Talk is one of their lists, Juan. Their list, their rules.
I respect a lot of Tor Project colaborators in the whole world and their respective works, their sincere efforts. I never would harm their work or would cause troubles because of injuried pride or revolt, Juan. Sorry, it doesn't work this way. I will fight against censorship when it will be necessary, not only for stubbornness or pride.
Ceci