On 9/27/20, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Guardian: New York Times publishes Donald Trump's tax returns in election bombshell. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/27/new-york-times-publishes-don... Jim Bell's comments: We should remember that the NY Times presumably obtained this tax return material illegally, just as the US government accuses Julian Assange of having obtained material illegally. NY Times should be held to account for failing to defend Assange for supposedly doing what the NYT also does. And, why doesn't the Federal Govt break down NY Times' doors and drag a few editors off to the same Federal jail where Jeffrey Epstein supposedly killed himself?
Not only those issues, but leaks prove the IRS Govt obviously cannot be trusted with peoples private information at all, that all their "confidentiality" and "security" marketing has been lies, and that all their $Billions of upgrades were wasted. Same with corporations. Just how long has the NYT been sitting on this holding it for October Surprise leaving no time for fair response? https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/09/27/us/donald-trump-taxes.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/27/us/trump-taxes-takeaways.html https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/nyt-publishes-10000-word-summary-20-years-... https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/nyts-10000-word-trump-tax-expose-revea... The cowards at the NYT did not actually publish Trump's actual tax returns, no one can check their analysis. They refused to publish any images, sanitized or otherwise, of what they claim they have. They printed a bunch of random words and pretty charts that may not be backed in anything, then they claimed anonymous source protection. "The paper said it would not publish the documents, in order to protect its source." Regardless of NYT posessing any true filed copies or not, it appears so far that everything is entirely within the letter of the law, with no court or other final outcome having been sustained to date. There is no fault or crime in navigating laws to your advantage. "Loss carryfowards or NOLs are perfectly acceptable and legal instrument which anyone can apply against future income" "Nor do they reveal any previously reported connections to Russia." Nor are Presidents or other politicians required by law to disclose their tax returns. Lying to the public and refusing to answer is bog standard fare practiced by all politicians. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBIKP4W50-I Bernie Sanders Lies for Democrats "The revelations threaten to damage Trump’s repeated claim to be a successful businessman and therefore a capable steward of the US economy." Lol, given that there are ZERO qualifications needed to be a politician, go investigate how many unsuccessful businessmen went into the only high paying fraud left to them... Politics. From which point they become successful at THAT, and not at being successful businessmen competing in the business sector. Articles full of bullshit Democrat rhetoric. "the basic press standard of not making unsupportable public allegations," NYT is clearly a journalistically compromised rag. With the rest of the halls of nationwide governments equally full of compromised frauds, hundreds getting busted every year... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_state_and_local_politicians_c... https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cbxabp/here_is_a_list_of_all_us... "there appears to be no wrongdoing, no Russia ties, and nothing of substance beyond what most corporations [and people] do" "While notable [moves], and hardly unique to just the president, this is probably not the damning climax so many in the anti-Trump field were expecting" The only real thing that appears to have been exposed so far is the depths to which Democrats will stoop. While being helped along by the totally biased ass kissing and censorship from most of major News Media and Social Media. Next up in the shitshow? Who knows :)