So assuming Snowden "borrowed" the slide from the NSA and he didn't get
owned, the slide is _REAL_.

Having in mind Snowden likely have large pile of slides, if he got
owned, likely all/the majority of them would likely be fake.

Is this plausible?

And did you missed the us-natsec trolling about the eu appearing to
trust Snowden's slides (though sometimes they can't prove it)?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 08:22:37AM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
> No but as I and others have noted, he didn't look at all of the materials
> he handed over to journalists and couldn't possibly be expected to remember
> all the ones he did see well enough to possibly be able to ID this one as
> altered or forged. He was only able to argue against the other documents
> because he had never been in touch with the outlet releasing them, contrary
> to their apparent belief.
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 07:50:14AM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
> > > As I think I said in the other thread, less specific charges that require
> > > more specific proof and almost never leveled before a trial is set,
> > because
> > > it forces the issue to be tried in the court of public opinion, where a
> > lot
> > > of information can't be released lest it spoil an investigation or
> > > potential trial. There's also the fact that there'd be little to gain at
> > > this point by alleging that the slides are fake since there would be few
> > > people to believe it,
> > >
> > > "NSA hasn't said it's fake" doesn't seem like a strong argument -
> > > especially for a non-NSA slide. And again - *Snowden himself* has accused
> > > outlets of releasing slides attributed to him that *he says he did not
> > > provide*.
> > >
> > Likely the NSA would distribute fake slides just to discredit Snowden.
> >
> > Does Snowden deny the authencity of this slide?
> >
> > This slide appeared in _too many_ news AFAICT to get unnoticed.
> >