btw, I accessed your link over httpS and it serves http, the implications of which are clear. From the source:
<IMG WIDTH="250" HEIGHT="75" SRC="http://cryptome.org/cryptome-01.jpg">
HTTPS has become a fetish, maybe always was. It serves as an end point fig leaf, simulates privacy and infosec, but does not protect visitors from the full stream of access to their traffic end to end. Same for shallow, exculpatory privacy policy always "taken very seriously" laughingly. So encryption and anonymization provide decorous couture of genitals while leaving the rest bare assed. Web sites are insecure by the very design of the Internet which allows operators and administrators full access to traffic "so it can be maintained properly." That is policed and spied behind misleading signs of safety like HTTPS and privacy policy. Every web site operator knows this and keeps it quiet to avoid scaring away visitors. So they adopt the latest fig leafs and earnestly promote them as essential while hacking and spying predators continue to ravage the Internet as if the planet was created for the benefit of warmakers and their engineers and suppliers.