On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:43:04 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
ask yourself why the state would need to amp its protections : nation state structures are not working its a dying form
...if that's true, then nation states are being replaced with a transnational state. Not exactly good news.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2016 07:40 AM, John Young wrote:
USG is not USA. Apple is not its buyers. USG v Apple is not about citizens and privacy. It's about secretkeepers against the public.
It's also about client (USG) vs. vendor (Apple). The fact that IT vendors get paid to comply with State demands is almost never mentioned in published accounts.
So does the status of many consumer IT vendors including Apple as 'defense' contractors, i.e. the Romas/COIN project and its replacement(s), where Apple was listed as a participant in the bidding process per HB Gary documents. This suggests that Apple is or sought to be complicit in spying on, manipulating, and killing members of the public - strictly for the money, of course.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWyGXIAAoJEDZ0Gg87KR0L0/8P/joTuI2zd0ayzAMEHvUb9aB9 n6dspcWT6q0Q/wKi8oTe+E5eGD0196d8CW+saYYMRD3dlS0PYIyHbQjXtPOiaJfR AyyAGchBd4TDXNAcHU6WtVr+z5YzdwCt0bnGvXYn3uVKfnDrLDkqqECjlMcT7hsN ztDbPpMCM1pIKI+4F4SQSuASPXLgQG9o1WGqFNct3kFU7rwFhjCnD6K207pdRQR1 P6aikROx7s2QIhPIfK8Oijj9THWA7ICW479fpuv1/yMdX55LPM4jSqmLz+A6WrM8 fBr4gS+je255FqzFEGsohRM9ATMA+FDtyTUmUSK3RCed2KeboDpgwE7GvoMjxdWT UsoNrS0laI7btWnfuD1C1K1Nnw9fIgkMDMX765Dh5ffJW3IjlpsgH0sDkzEbh7t5 HweosYK7yQCcs6r2aU6P2Agi7DxlrDdhXeuEShpYtGS22CDUi+ShJeWAmGjF/yrp zAWMvLr8KamNZLJdZbU7EHfQCMZ+2KfDdAhvpsSYWJEgrDKdPipDM8Pg4UJ3n2ZA UL7E/pMor02syevSOADC+D8zXY19WDpVasLQAcFiQKY/JmRY/BXGaXGnZPvdd22E ZwONlRLVUzZ0OX6A0+Dc3p0A7CjcJQgAxVYhk/khCvFfNe3gv1Yf3tKFAc9bCz12 KALU9VYhfB79ohiVkQJ8 =E5v4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----