Okay, I saw a very old (19 years ago) email.  I read it.  I didn't have a comment.   Do you have a question?

               Jim Bell

On Monday, January 6, 2020, 07:29:05 PM PST, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:


You'll notice whose prominently missing from this convo.

Jim Bell.

Know why?

He didn't really want an answer.

He wants a reason to be paranoid.

Nutjob

Rr

On 1/4/20 2:03 PM, John Young wrote:
> X-Sender: tcmay@mail.got.net
> Message-Id: <a05010401b6829912c4bc@[207.111.241.18]>
> In-Reply-To: <200101082217.RAA29708@johnson.mail.mindspring.net>
> References: <200101082217.RAA29708@johnson.mail.mindspring.net>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:59:33 -0800
> To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>, cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
> From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
> Subject: Re: Bell Case Subpoena
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>
> At 5:09 PM -0500 1/8/01, John Young wrote:
> >Today at 4:30 PM two Treasury agents, Tom Jack and Matthew
> >Mc Whirr, served me a Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury,
> >in US District Court of Western Washington, Seattle, WA, on
> >January 25, 2001, 9:00 AM. Robb London, AUSA, is the
> >applicant.
> >
> >The subpoena states in bold caps "We request that you do not
> >disclose the existence of this subpoena, because such a
> >disclosure may make it more difficult to conduct the investigation."
> >...
> >   Please provide any and all documents, papers, letters, computer
> >   disks, photographs, notes, objects, information, or other items
> >   in your possession or under your control, including electronically
> >   stored or computer records, which:
> >
> >     1. Name, mention, describe, discuss, involve or relate to James
> >     Dalton Bell, a/k/a Jim Bell, or
>
>
> By the way, John, thanks for the "heads up." I purged my archives of
> Jim Bell e-mail sent directly to me, though I left on my system the
> e-mail he copied the list on.
>
>
> (Yes, I purged the back-ups, too. A good reason not to back up e-mail
> to CD-Rs.)
>
>
> --Tim May