On Wed, 28 May 2014 19:45:06 -0400
Griffin Boyce <griffin@cryptolab.net> wrote:

>    My suspicion is that either they were hacked (and had their key
> stolen), or that they were ordered to shutdown and recommend
> Microsoft's (presumably backdoored) BitLocker as a replacement.

        truecrypt.org redirects to this
        http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/

        Pretty crazy. Whoever the developers may be, after spending a
        good deal of effort on their project, now are licking MS'
        boots? It doesn't make sense.

> BitLocker's enterprise documentation makes me *incredibly* suspicious
> that it is susceptible to monitoring by third-parties.
>
>    Even being embarrassed by whatever bugs the second phase audit
> uncovered wouldn't explain the sudden recommendation. And why not
> ecryptfs or ~literally anything else~ ?
>
>    Pardon my tinfoil hat.
>
> ~Griffin