On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:40:52 +0100 Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote:
On 24/09/18 00:13, juan wrote:
especially dedicated to agent fairbrother, 'expert' on metals
One ought to learn to sort out the obviously bullshit.
Begins: "Never before or after 9/11 have steel framed buildings collapsed due to fire".
Unfortunately that is simply not true; nor relevant to what purports to be a comparison between WTC and Windsor Tower, as Windsor Tower was not steel-framed
oops - true. You must be happy you earned 1 debating point =) Still, speaking of obvious bullshit :
Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3 (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
Did you show us the 'design docs' stating that 'WTC' would collapse after 3 hours? for reference : 1 of the towers lasted 56 minutes, the other one 1 hour 40 minutes and building 7 stood for ~7 hours. I guess "3" can mean anything then.