I am mildly curious to look at a set of "false positive" pictures: The pictures that his system reports are suspicious, but in fact are not. Why is it wrong?

Also: Is his system based on (simulated) neural networks, or some other technology?

Jim Bell

On Tuesday, June 19, 2018, 8:58:15 PM PDT, Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm sure the tech he cobbled together has lots of other uses. For example, astronomers might use it to search images for anomalies or interesting objects.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 7:55 PM jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:

I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it:

The $300 system in the fight against illegal images - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-44525358

* Disclaimer *

The BBC is not responsible for the content of this email, and anything written in this email does not necessarily reflect the BBC's views or opinions. Please note that neither the email address nor name of the sender have been verified.

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android