On July 21, 2016 2:26:18 AM EDT, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 01:52:11 -0600 Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 07/19/2016 03:38 PM, juan wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 03:40:20 -0600 Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 07/19/2016 03:15 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
The dawning inescapable realisation that "he's right" and was right all along about Tor Inc.
Well, I wouldn't go that far ;)
If Tor were actually secure, I could accept that US government uses it for evil.
So Mirimir, what's the problem here? Am I failing to explain fuckingly basic facts or are you playing dumb?
Tor IS actually secure IF YOU ARE THE FUCKING US MILITARY. If on the other hand you are one of their TARGETS then tor IS NOT SECURE.
Is something unclear?
What's your evidence for that? I doubt that it's technical, from what you've shared.
It certainly is 'technical', pretty basic, and you must be as aware of this just as I am, so I don't understand why you want me to repeat it. Trolling? Bah.
But here it goes again! Pay fucking attention.
The US military is a 'global adversary' - they have enough taps on cables, exchanges, ASs, whatever, to be able to deanonimize tor users. Especially so called 'hidden' services.
On the other hand, people like, say, Ross Ulbricht, don't have taps on the global fiber infrastructure, don't have access to IXPs, can't hack routers, etc. Get that?
I agree, sadly. I still think it's interesting tech though. John -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.