On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:41:57 -0400 Joshua Case <jwcase@gmail.com> wrote:
Some women have dicks.
Nope, that's stupid nonsense.
Sorry. Not my fault.
You saying nonsense is your fault.
It just happens to be the case.
No it doesn't happen to be case. And funny how you went from "labels don't matter", to "what I say is absolutely true" - hypocritical much eh? Feel free to re-read my previous message and give a meaningul answer, or keep robotically repeating 'progressive' bullshit, Mr. O'Brien.
On May 23, 2017, at 5:26 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 17:04:05 -0400 Joshua Case <jwcase@gmail.com> wrote:
women don't have dicks - by defintion.
Did someone fall in love an get a surprise? Otherwise, why bother yourself with someone else’s labels?
Why bother with labels at all? Why care if xxxxx is the 'private' key or the 'public' key? It's just labels and random numbers...
I’m sorry you find it politically incorrect to use language that attaches dicks to women, but that is the world you live in. Description is better than prescription with language, I think.
Title: Nineteen eighty-four Author: George Orwell (pseudonym of Eric Blair) (1903-1950)
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100021.txt
funnily enough, looks like the book can't be found in the americunt version of project gutenberg.
Of course, there are things we must agree upon if we’re to congregate successfully, but is this really one of them?
My point is, I'm under no obligation to conform to 'politically correct' totalitarian bullshit. Therefore I am not going to pretend that people who are not women are women. Not only this is an exercise of fucking free speech, it's also a matter of sticking to basic truth.