Insider Threats? Re: What if my hypothesis regarding Snowden is correct?

19 Jun 2017

      Thomas ANGLIN Kelley, FBI GC, scheduled for spring recess appointment as
FBI Director & already papered by Trump was killed first week of april 2017
to prevent that. Did 9/11 official story.

Patrick W. Kelley, FBI OIC, "FBI Office of Oversights", runs 7,000 front CI
organizations, most are themed shells like "Klan-Destine" and "Secret
Enclave" or "religious" covers used for infiltration. Position authorizes
"otherwise illegal activities" and provides "Oversights".

Florence Nakakuni Kelley, imperial white supremacist, wife of Patrick W.
Kelley, US District Attorney Pacific, including most of the federal court
authorizations after US business hours; facilitated laundering and illegal
wiretap facility Guam & Hawaii (& Japan) + processing covered by Hawaii
National Guard, proxied laundering by ficticious "Kingdom" and papered
events including Snowden, Greenwald, 9/11, etc.

Clarence M. Kelley, pulled back from FBI to Kansas City police 1961 by Mark
Felt prior positioning of JFK..Nixon, then put in as FBI Director after
noone else signed up.

James Kelley, did JFK as Secret Service operations director, father of
{Thomas Patrick Colleen Tom DavidJ Steve Gary} Kelley.

Colleen M. Kelley, 1974 NTEU >> OPM .gov "pigs in the system" staffing /
positioning for ALL federal jobs.

Deforest Kelley, 1940s Navy propaganda specialist, well known for "how-to"
videos across all military branches, especially social etiquite and
homosexual activity. Star-Trek  "Doc" as navy counter-intelligence
propaganda. Also gunsmoke / "OK Coral".

Alexander W. Joel, "Civil Liberties" @ DNI, coordinated & ran most of the
civil liberties ploys including torture poland,
"battery-water-board-meetings" (still happening @ oDNI office), and
everything you heard about in the news.
...
Jill Kelley
David J. Kelley
Sean M. Joyce
Vida G. Bottom
Gordon M. Snow
Kelley[]...
On Sunday, June 18, 2017, Wilfred L. Guerin wrote:
...
Nakakuni-Kelley, us-da pacific, husband Patrick-Kelley runs FBI
"Oversights" "OIC", aunt/uncle of Jill Kelley; FBI Vida Bottom insider
threat expert was sent to HNL to manage Snowden after CIA/NSA Japan. Same
unit (Gordon Snow, Sean Joyce, Alexander Joel, Bottom, Nakakuni, 50+
Kelley) run ALL of the "Civil Liberties" CI events since 1990s. Includes
torture @ poland, #Anonymous, y2k mess, snowden & derived, and of course
the DIA (& NATO) units pre-staging a lot of it. "Oversights": Managed! see
also "Enterprise Organization" & oDNI "FBI Oversight" disclosure
exceptions. "civil liberties"
On Sunday, June 18, 2017, Steve Kinney  wrote:
...
On 06/18/2017 04:18 PM, Wilfred L. Guerin wrote:
...
"Snowed-In @ Moskow" "David Miranda Writes" "Manning the Deck" FBI CI
101. Same DIA + FBI unit managed and papered those stupid staged events
and hundreds more. "Reality Winner"???
To date I have seen no indications that Manning was set up.  In terms of
impact, Snowden and (especially) Winner could be said to have advanced
IC agendas and objectives.  Manning not so much:  Those leaks caused
numerous diplomatic incidents with the U.S. a clear loser, and got U.S.
forces kicked out of Iraq for quite a while.
The timing of the PRISM release to remove Manning's trial from the news
is also an indicator of sorts.
:o)
g2s
...
...
To date I have seen no indications that
Manning was set up.
Adrian Llamo set him up. A database hacker with a debt to credit card
companies as restitution for a hack bust
Rr
and Barrett Brown's girlfriend...
...
...
On Sunday, June 18, 2017, Steve Kinney 
...
...
mailto:admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
On 06/18/2017 02:24 AM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> The hypothesis being that Snowden is at least a triple agent. Ali
    > Mohammed provided material support to Al Qaeda, but that was
    because he
    > betrayed both the Army and Al Qaeda for the CIA. His sentencing
    has been
    > on hold for a long time, and it is interesting no one asks
questions
    > about it.
My guess is that Snowden was an unwitting agent, spotted early by
the
    insider threat program and selected for use in a limited hangout.
If
    so, he was exposed to scripted events in the workplace to draw his
    attention to specific programs, and given e-z access to selected
    documents related to those programs.  In the network age,
censorship
    ranges from difficult to impossible depending on the context;
getting
    ahead of an adversary and dominating the messaging on a given
topic has
    gained a new importance.  I think the Snowden Affair may be an
example.
Glenn Greenwald's behavior, selecting a few of Snowden's documents
to
    publish and burying the rest, is consistent with this model.  So
too is
    his initiative in pushing the publication date of the (partially
    falsified) PRISM pages back to coincide with the first day of the
    Manning trial, knocking it all the way out of the news.
The huge controversy following the release of the first few Snowden
    documents produced what results?  It seems that the intel guys won
every
    engagement, even setting a precedent that senior U.S. intelligence
    officials are allowed to lie to Congressional committees under
oath with
    no penalty of any kind.  The way it all went down suggests to me
that
    the intel guise had a long lead time to select and prepare for
specific
    challenges.
> Snowden's revelations increased the amount of encryption.
The only place I saw that happen was a significant bump in the use
of
    SSL by a wider range of website operators.  Given that the SSL key
    signing protocol is deeply flawed and the NSA is uniquely well
    positioned to conduct MITM attacks negating that particular form of
    encryption, no harm done.  The result is an increase in end users'
    "false sense of" security - and a small net gain in "national
security"
    in the sense of making access to network traffic a little harder
for
    foreign intel and private sector criminal enterprises.
A casual observer might believe that the Snowden docs caused
significant
    harm to U.S. interests, most notably when it was revealed the
Angela
    Merkel's phones were tapped - but those particular documents came
from
    an as yet unknown source, probably located in Germany.
I don't "believe" a word of the above analysis.  But I do consider
it
    more likely than the alternatives I have seen.