On Sun, Aug 1, 2021, 12:09 PM David Barrett <dbarrett@expensify.com> wrote:

Kind of related to this, but for corporate rather than political purposes: https://www.protocol.com/expensify-ceo-silenced-no-more

That's a great thing, David.  Thank you.  Not sure why you're on this kinda-messed-up list, maybe for the tidbits that fall out sometimes.

It does read to me like the article leaves out two things that are pretty important:

- confirmation or a date that the nda's are actually amended

- letting people disclose illegal acts done in the name of the business, as well as between people in the workplace

Not meaning to argue anything, just relating how it read to me.

Apologies for below cruft; on mobile.

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021, 5:22 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

On 8/1/21, stef <s@ctrlc.hu> wrote:
> wasn't intelexit an art project by the berlin peng! collective?

Yes, and also by Schneier and Drake, but it's not purely art
since they do take intake, even if it only ends up in a referral.

There was also OpenLeaks by ?Dan D-Berg?, which is long dead.
DDoSecrets.
Cryptome.
And a few other uniques.

Plus all the news media digging for scraps
ever since WL went inactive while still sitting
on old, and intaking new, docs.

Almost no services mentioned in this entire thread have
or will ever publish currently active TOP-SECRET/SCI
unredacted for its full impact.

And the choice of where to go, from self-publishing into
the darknet, up through formal GovCorp whistleblowing
channels, is certainly not easy.

That's another reason GovCorp wants to keep WL on ice
in limbo forever... no resolution = a FUD environment
keeping new leakers mentally trapped inside it.

There's a path out of that trap...

If what you see is wrong, there's really no option
but to do the right thing.