‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, November 16, 2019 5:45 PM, Punk-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
... well, tyrannicide is a moral obligation. And the right to defend oneself from govcorp is the obvious extention of the natural rights to life, liberty and property. And so, killing govcorp agents (unless let's say, they surrender) is legitimate.
to murder is to forfeit the moral argument. in terms of cognitive bias alone, better to err towards never killing - i could cite ethical reasons as well, but they are well worn. (we condemn state orchestrated murder, AP is just a decentralized tyrant doing same)
Using 'crowdfunding', anonymous comms and virtual 'money' to coordinate defensive actions against govcorp would be typically cypherpunk, obviously. Though my personal view is that there's no way govcorp would allow THEIR 'technology' to be used against them.
"the street finds its own uses for things" the beauty of mass resistance is that the tools are already prevalent. we have a beautiful reference case unfolding before us: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactics_and_methods_surrounding_the_2019_Hong_... choose no murder choose mass resistance best regards,