On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 02:46:38 +0000 Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote:
If Russia since Putin hadn't made several exotic attacks on civilian ex-spies, billionaires and militants in the UK,
ahaha - I was about to ask if you believed 'the russians' poisoned that skripal guy? I guess your answer is YES THEY DID!! ... ?
But no, it doesn't make a lot of sense politically afaics, so for now I'll leave it at "it probably wasn't Russia".
ok
A false flag? By who - the US? Sorry, I don't believe that for a minute.
But that's the correct answer. To be mora precise, not just the yanks but the anglo-american fascists. So that would be the yanks and their english accomplices.
Plus they haven't taken advantage of it as a casus belli.
They haven't?
So no, not the Yanks.
Which leaves Assad. Morally he'd definitely do it, in a trice,
What's that supposed to mean, 'morally'? If we look at actual actions of the anglo-american fascists, we see that they have commited every possible kind of mass murder, includign nuking a couple of cities(something only the anlo-american fascists have 'achieved') So we know as a matter of plain historical record that they are willing to commit any atrocity "in a trice". Or faster. So how does real hard facts compare to indicting somebody on...what? Your claim that somebody MAY hypothetically do something?
Qui bono? Publicity-wise, the US and/or rebels might benefit,
at least a fact =) (by the way, by 'rebels' you mean mercenaries of the anlog-american fascists, right? ) So, 'publicity wise' the anglo-american fascists benefit, which is of course the reason why they did it. In case you haven't noticed, the anglo-american fascists have been meddling with, looting and terrorizing the middle east since...let's say the end of the 19th century. Sp their recurrent false flag attacks don't have to be tied to any particular 'war' since the anglo-amaerican fascists run a perpetual war in the middle east.
but neither have taken advantage of it,
lawl...