On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, 7:20 PM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/18/21, Woody Wood <thedogsh@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, but I thought this was cypherpunks. Not a place to push political agendas and covid theories.
I joined this list hoping to learn and engage in some cryptography discussions.
Yet another never before seen popup agent troll, whose first post is
"lurker"
Cpunks write code, they
have to do it gratis for
you
no rudeness intended, just disagreement
They prefer politics instead of privacy
Funny those that are too triggered by simple news of politicians slapping them in the face with their anti-privacy regimes, yes too triggered by mere presence of such topics, to realize that privacy is still very much alive and well as an underlying fundamental here.
real political discussion of course involves clear discourse. one expects individual political groups to engage each other in more intense ways but we are doing more than this, in our ways. Without news, there would be no awareness and motivation to
counter things, no efforts to try wielding crypto in battles that none even thought to consider or knew might need or could be fought, even without any posters interpretive commentary.
news In fact there are years and years of threadposts on censorship and
encrypted crypto political moves by politicians being made against human freedom, more freedom being removed and power added every day, giving you awareness that censorship anti-freedom globalism politician maneuvers Govt and Corp etc must be countered, exposed, fought. And what of the shatting upon those messengers.
Crypto is free to talk and write here, quit whining and do that.
to support crypto, support people speaking to support it be well