29 Nov
2014
29 Nov
'14
8:29 p.m.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:59:50 -0800 coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
If that were the case, then a shielded, passive receiver ought to be OK,
a shielded, passive receiver would be overwhelmed by the brute flood.
Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't a shielded receiver be a useless receiver? If you shield a receiver from a jamming signal, you are also shielding it from the signal you want to receive? What am I missing?