23 Sep
2018
23 Sep
'18
3:50 a.m.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 03:02:49 +0100 Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote:
On 21/09/18 20:00, juan wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:20:19 +0100 Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote:
WTC was rated for 3 hours major fire resistance.
Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3 (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
It's in the design docs.
Where's your evidence for that claim Peter? WHERE are those 'design docs' ?
Can't be bothered to look up any original references, and they need a lawyer to interpret anyway,
OK - So you don't have any reference for the claim and you admit that even if there was, it can mean anything, according to 'lawyers' . Thank you.