20 Oct
2020
20 Oct
'20
6:18 a.m.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:58:02 +1000 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
If you don't have a state and state religion, you get conquered.
On 2020-10-20 16:06, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
So if you don't have a state, then you end up having a state. So you need a state to not be conquered by the state. That's called statist 'logic'.
A state ruled by a friendly elite that identifies with the community that created it is a marked improvement on an enemy state that hates the community.
As I already mentioned, that's what every statist say. 'Their' state is 'good'. Other state 'bad'. You forgot to quote that part, you worthless, retarded, dishonest piece of shit.