--- intro ---

observation based on the assumption that everything is code, to some degree or other. in this, that everything that can be is mapped into language systems and mathematical context, and that there is an outer boundary or edge of description, rationalization, where questions and ideas meet, beyond pre-existing answers and ideologies- new data or anomalies that break the worldview, reigning perspective, or shared context.

code is thus not just an invention from punchcard looms for algorithms of calculation and thus only in its binary format legitimate, nor is crypto so limited to only be an issue of silicon hardware/software tools for conveying hidden or secure messaging. metaphor to semaphore as language itself flips its bits.

quilts an example of stories embedded within a particular structural system, telling of events and people within an abstracted language requiring 'increased awareness' or  'new literacy' to decode. patterns- modular constructions, repeated and unique, style as it relates to substance and the symbolic- likely a more pure form of communication than buggy computer code as a basis for the same, seemingly even more secure if the connection is hidden and inaccessible to the unknowing, except shared key quilters.

atmosphere created and sustained this way as consciousness, shared understanding and awareness and value and systems of communication, association and correlation, and grounding of ideas within the realm of objects, ideas made tangible via the material and yet not cold and detached and themselves hidden, and instead upfront, aesthetic creations asking to be looked at, reviewed, evaluated, inspected, and maybe perhaps you could also begin to read and understand the stories they are carrying within.

pattern recognition, in this way, though into deeper interpretation than soup can label equals soup can label, the realm of nuance and juxtaposition, advanced dynamics of association, frameworks, scaffolding, structures built to convey such messaging.

in this way, so too flower arranging. decentralized and distributed code networks, perimeters of dynamic interrelations, flowers appearing at events as symbolic subtext to mediate exchange or secure and enhance a shared zone via their given aesthetics. these, wide ranging and as deep as nature and its understanding. the gear-like flower evoking perhaps a mechanization, the colors their own language mapping the world and its social dynamics, love, friendship, drama and danger, specific patterns telling stories birth to death, celebration to impending doom. sunrises and sunsets, the moon and birth of stars, and of music in their visual and fragrant ethereal delight, the reminder of what is missing in the technological assemblage, detached from nature, by comparison a vase of sensors and LED candlelight fail to warm the heart, imagination.

and thus the floral arrangement as form of secure communication, for someone to not know of this realm of cultural literacy, to miss the icepick flower amidst others, while those who see it know what is arriving next. and thus of limits and bounds to observation, as crayon-like simplicities exist for awareness by the uninitiated, especially those without appreciation for natural aesthetics and their language- and the lost intelligence that results from this, which itself can be a security threat if not able to read the signs, especially as they may occupy one's particular world.

in this way the code of flowers can be a highly developed skill and awareness, a means to establish secure communication and remote connections at a distance, even if relayed or in the presence of others, given a shared framework for interpretation. and so some observers may be effectively blind to the hidden content or code within, and incapable of reading the details or structures involved,which could be patterns on the flowers themselves, the different types of leaves or various plant forms, as these combine into larger relational structures that can mirror the surrounding world and provide insight via this correlation and alignment, if developed as a practice. for some it may never go beyond the color for roses as a mapping of social protocol, a symbolic and perhaps hollow expectation, turned into a commodity. another thing. whereas for others this depth and detail could be as large as nature to consider and communicate within, and thus not only for the florist, the botanist and those who study and relate and exchange ideas in these domains, this knowledge enabling code similarly, across structural systems of empirical observation, this as 'reasoning'.

in this way the disciplines, archaeology to zoology, mechanics to small businesses of a particular domain, hidden communications through the symbolism involved in shared frameworks and exchange. at some point, perhaps, additional messages carried along the carrier waves of these shared structures and assumptions, rightly or wrongly.

the limit to this or conundrum seemingly being insight, or lack thereof and instead a rote presumption of some bounded meaning that never goes into or beyond the ordinary and thus in some sense dead ideas or ideological dispositions to the same domain. this is the danger of rationalization, deciding upon or fixing a perspective that may become rigid and unquestioning, a regime of interpretation that may bound further inquiry, improvement, and development beyond some prevailing condition. and in this a lack of insight if not due to lack of reflection or self-awareness could occur that instills and requires this incapacitation as a normality, as a mode of existence. whereby things are only what they are, nothing else beyond the given point of view. it could be the difference between ideas which are alive and those that are dead.

consider birdwatching where some may observe birds to check off a particular type of bird from their most-wanted observational list and those who may observe birds in their backyard or in the park and consider their existence and enjoy their presence. if birdwatching was just a pattern-matching exercise the larger issues of birds such as their role as mobile sensors of environment health and a diagnostic for changing ecosystem patterns could be detached from this, and thus only the checkmark matters and amounts to a leisure activity without greater insight into what is actually being observed. whereas if birding data is fed into larger databases by bird watchers or others who monitor habitats, that can help build maintain and adjust models to help account for present and future ecological dynamics, which can relate to policy if it were a value in civilizational development, versus a footnote without a feedback loop enough to actually alter the dynamics, due to development patterns having turned the entire realm of wildlife into compartmentalized zoos, emptied of larger species of wildlife, the state parks now held within zones of unending suburbanization. those who can see and understand what it means when there are no robins singing in spring may then understand the signaling of nature in regards to its pattern language, or as with clouds and weather, connect with this natural knowledge and as others likewise, relate in a shared awareness and domain with regard to its meaning, substance.

in this way, the pileated woodpecker may signify something and in its mystery, in sighting or observing it, there can be insight to find it in a location that it has never been seen or known to exist. and likewise, a card sent in the mail of a bird or wildlife scene may similarly evoke such messaging, for the initiated. this is the realm of the symbolic and reliant on shared awareness and understanding, else to simply evoke something intangible that may never be understood in its depth for those without such literacy, and therefore remain in a realm of mystery, missed connection or a subtext that is inaccessible, though perhaps through another observer this same event will find its grounding via secure connection. the importance of boundaries and thresholds, and how bias skew and distortion could create barriers to interpretation because some event is *unlike* and thus may remain unobserved in its dimensionality where such meaning may be encoded, if not encrypted, and this could be of a natural realm, nature itself, or guided by human involvement and shaping of perception, as with cards or arrangements or research developing and sharing perspectives. though as information itself, whatever its substance, it would appear to exist as knowledge that functions as code, has programmatic qualities and degrees of comprehension that can lead from genetics and throughout the chemical and biological sciences outward, to ecosystems and habits and society and customs and rituals, and thus anthropology and onward, to the mundane everyday that in itself can be extraordinary, simply in sitting in a park or on the steps of a dwelling and to have such empirical encounters that may be developed or accessed or communicate in such a realm, here nor there in the context of technological civilization and yet primary to the heart, connection with others, and another way of saying and sharing and conveying vital information, ideas, shared awareness. and in this, a weather report or gorgeous looping radar image could itself as language, as a symbolic code, function as if a type of poetry via its visualization of this ineffable other realm - such that, in its aesthetics, perhaps it is of much greater value to have a 'painting' of such imagery looping within a digital frame as a painting that a copy of a copy of impressionist works centuries previous, as if most telling about what is beyond the door, lived context. this then of representation, also. as signs align and correlate with experiences. and the value of awareness, the meaning involved in these events, their role as shared and unshared code. what are the domains of this programmatic language and mathematics that you inhabit, like and unlike others. what domains does this extra-communicative activity take place. is it within hobbies or passions that make you unique, and how does your depth of interest relate or bound you from others- what does it open up in connection and allow for in terms of secure exchange and what does it close down by its misalignment or lack of connection due to boundaries of self and-or others?

again, literacy seems all-critical, and in this the issue of sparking or developing that vital interest that opens up the fascination these discoveries and revelations can have within a life. the oft told story of young boys (and occasionally girls) whose fathers' taught them how to take things apart or worked on electronics kits, many times engineers and many with electronics backgrounds. whereas for others, the children may grow up inept, and with no such skills, perhaps as their parents did not have this same affordance either, thus impacting generation after generation in turn.

graffiti is another area of code consideration, especially in terms of its ambiguity and potential difficulty in reading or deciphering for the uninitiated or outsiders, whether via colors or various styles or the meaning involved, though at the level of the alphabetic- the prevalence in the "superposition" of multiple potential letters at the same time, within the same word, to shift meaning via small details that can create out of one word fragment, sentence-like constructions. this is a remarkable skill and insight into the code of communicating and is an advanced approach to that communication keyboard reliant, bounded in any such ambiguitization at the scale of the letter itself, the typo occurring only by substitution digitally, tnis, though perhaps it is a similar idea with an additional typographic element, custom fonts allowing more to occur in the graphic detournement.

and it should be said, as part of this hidden communication context and of code, that the cryptic writing oftentimes found on the back of streetsigns offers yet another potential application of crypto code in the everyday environment, no computers needed to observe yet without shared library or literacy, likely impenetrable for meaning. though rumored -these instructions- related to black helicopter society and direction for covert civilization who may key in and out of these infrastructural subtexts, markers as if waypoints, all signs eventually pointing to armageddon, this way...

--- on color coding ---

here, the sociological and cultural. 'whites' and 'blacks' as racial identities and how much data and bias can be formatted into worldviews and nuanced into structures relied upon by group identities. this then ranging perhaps to context of rainbow as cryptic evaluation of the varying hues, part of a larger shared spectral condition. and how beliefs, ideas, philosophies can exist according to these frameworks. it could be more complex or involved than color alone, and thus issues of boundaries, rationalizations, and limited interpretations, as this relates to issues of literacy and shared awareness and 'reasoning'. here again the binary is most dangerous, to over simplify and then roughcut reality to only a limited if self-biased viewpoint.

the role of depth in this, what is true is true, and getting or accessing this truth versus trying to control and maintain some limited version of it which best suits a partial idea, protecting that 'fragment' in place of the larger whole and in doing so sacrificing the truth to sustain the larger structural falsity as if this truth. and thus ungrounded observations often seek to keep truth out to sustain a flawed POV and protect a version of events, yet this is very shallow and cannot be sustained beyond the finite limit, and itself bounds awareness to only what is inside that threshold.

whereas in a feedback based, error-correcting observation of a surrounding context, the involved 'ecological dynamics' must be related to via accurate modeling of truth and thus ideas models hypotheses must be able to include truth of these dynamics and not seek to limit it via rationalization based on some partiality, as if the whole. terrible language this though like history, to fold into it humanity and women and not account for these dynamics then establishes structural distortions, lies even, to uphold and sustain a given false framework and unshared point of view.

and yet likewise, to seek to include the larger ecological dynamics of female being the counterpoint within the same private limitation of feminism establishes its own biases and repeats the structuralization reliant upon the false perspective, in so far as larger truth is edited out of the shared human relations, whereby again there is no public beyond that of private wo|man and it becomes an issue of picking sides. nothing like having a contest between men and women for the place of representing the whole of humanity. it just does not make any sense, unless in a binary framework that legitimates it as an ideology, a tradeoff canceling the other reality, substituting it for a new one that shares and relies upon the same structural defects, as origin. thus 'bias' is transformed into a "right" and people can choose their own reality and this becomes a political process born of inadequate constitutional code that fosters this kind of programming that functions against humans and our shared awareness.

this, my view, is likely flawed though offered as an interpretation of events and seeks to provide context for something that is formatting these relations and the way they are communicated by others means. certainly women themselves have developed their own ways of hidden communication and language, though the further it has become ideological the more fragmented the 'whole' view has been, where consensus is not an issue only of sex or gender as a class, because there can be low resolution from any view as to how it relates to a larger life, beyond a finite issue, as they combine into a life involving others, including in some cases, the antithesis (if not men).

for sake of madness if not sanity let us just imagine that the entire world is run by men and even the domain of women is controlled by men, in some place more readily yet even in unexpected realms like fashion, to the point that androgyny tends towards the transvestite as the biased model for the 'shared aesthetics' of women, exhibiting a passive-aggressive hatred yet viable substitute, where female beauty is replaced by an army of manmade mannequins that have a male-friendly agenda, as an exploit even of the sexual domain, a conquering and annihilation of female beauty and its profanation such that her beauty cannot be allowed to exist without being subverted, spoiled, used against her, just like corrupt crypto- buying into it destroys the very idea, and this by design. and so what of an ideology that could promote such a hidden agenda, what kind of cause would be involved in using the sign and image of women and female beauty against herself and also against the men who love her, making repugnant the fascination and devotion by substituting it for something else (A=B), therefore amplifying perhaps the ambiguity and confusion and turning towards another approach, which tends towards the male-male dynamic as it contains both the male (anima) and the female (animus) between males as a bounded shared relation and awareness. In this way, the actual female is removed from the male relation and replaced by another male who takes on the female dimension, and such programming is used to control sexual dynamics within the subset of males, such that the basis for relations becomes:

   males (female+male)

And likewise, for the other side of this divide, female relations:

   females (male+female)

This in terms of set(subset) relations, whereby male-female & male-male would be the mating context, and female-male & female-female, in terms of a sex/gender divide. A lot more to it than this, including adding in dimensions of patriarchy and matriarchy and also God|desses, as these may map into both realms simultaneously. And also the psychological basis for these dynamics in their normality (female psyche of males = anima, male psyche of females = animus) which is a vital part of the human maturation process, whereby an adult is balanced in both their male and female aspects and not seeking to retain only one-sidedness, which can lead to great interrelation problems including abuse and suffering. The ideal relation of this subtext code of being then being a 'human female' and 'human male' who each have their own anima/animus issues that balance across the total shared circuit of being, and this as a traditional basis for relations and the wealth of developing long-term relation via marriage.

   male (anima) & female (animus)

or in other words, the totality of each person...

   male (masculine+feminine) & female (masculine+feminine)

And for each person this weighting could be different, some males may be more feminine in certain dimensions than others, though more masculine in certain areas, and likewise women may be more feminine or masculine attributes, and this would need to be complimentary and balance across the relations, which is psychological yet also social, which leads to belief that opposites can actually be very complimentary as the circuitry can have a full range across all the various potential dynamics.

the point of this being that there are issues of awareness involved in identity, shared and unshared, and this especially so in terms of sexuality and gender as it relates to a preexisting biased condition of state and civilizational development that polarizes if not penalizes and makes impossible grounded relations between males and females in a way that 'benefits both' and instead via binary relations could become an issue of ~one must lose for another to gain, this a structural condition an thus destruction of family units and marriages because the foundation of relations is such that "one person's rights take away another person's equal rights". and thus an implicit form of submission is involved, both culturally yet also personally in that to span the sexual and gender dynamics can lead to normalizing this skew, structures thus reliant on warping and distortion to maintain 'shared reality' that is actually unshared and occurs by other means via subset dynamics (intra-woman, intra-men) as this continues to divide and subdivide until there are no relations anymore, else they become encrypted and only remote connections are possible, feasible, because the exploitation and total control is so complete, so annihilating, that there is no room anymore for love or grounded passion or connection or shared insight, basically outlawed or made illegal by the standing mediocrity that rules via this corruption.

and then there is a voice that arises, a shared perspective mapped into the feminine, Code Pink within a mass mediated landscape that seemingly represents something of this condition, a counterpoint that just makes sense as a perspective- a viewpoint that is not confined within the mainstream view if not due to disenfranchisement as part of a reasoning process beyond that of private viewpoints- which has a public dimension, and that males and females can relate to or through via its symbology. it is as if a secret communication is given voice to say what is thought yet otherwise not heard, or breaks into consciousness what already exists within daily flows of relations and yet is silenced via these same environments, specifically via bias and the role of female imagination and action being removed from most every domain as having value and worth and importantly- insight, and knowledge of what is going on. this, the conceit of male perspective as primary and also superior in awareness, not accounting for limitations or skew and thus choosing errors over their correction if the feedback loop is broken or unobserved via power relations, which is normalized. the burka of ideology forced onto the minds of women as a means of controlling the state and the 'men' who require this in order to have their stations, virtually.

--- crypto currency ---

this may be an impossible point to make. it involves the disconnect between males and females as a structural necessity of the broken code of state and its effect on these same relations in terms of how they are formatted and within what frameworks, most especially the context of money- whereby to survive people have to make decisions that can correlate with choosing money versus love, say, as a path to existence. and thus 'those who love' yet are without money, may be without female companionship and connections while 'those with money who do not love' may have female companionship.

and it is assumed for those literate, that the males and females in these situations are cognizant of their own conditions and decision-making and trade-offs involved. and so it is not ignorance and instead perhaps necessity, that females of interest are oftentimes with males essentially most concerned with themselves, firstly. while other males who serve women in their lives and actions may be living without them, though through their devotion and service seek to reestablish the lost connection.

and this can be as fundamental as truth itself. truth of female existence both in its existence context, the legitimacy of feminism in a context of history, and associated politics and policies as a difficult terrain required to obtain basic changes to the structures that oppress and limit by default, though also of accompanying bias and distortions resulting from any such interactions at the level of society, breakage occurring as the gears are out of alignment across the totality of state and thus demystifying and making regular the female role as that of another constituent in a competing marketplace, as if him or her or me in any instance of the individual and the public prerogative, who gets to speak in this instance and in what frameworks.

in this way, in all honesty it becomes quite clear: women can be incredibly shallow, selfish, and exploit dynamics mainly for their benefit and self-serving viewpoints, and thus error-reliant perspectives and limited interpretations can lead to classic dynamics that devolve unshared relations- and this becomes "discourse" on television as wave after wave of dysfunctional male and female dramas play out on the stage, cheating, vanity, sexual subversion, physical violence and psychological abuse. as if the television wasteland is the inner mind and what inhabits the deep hidden recesses of the unknown, locally, yet as a sign becomes a reference for given encounters. and thus the empirical aspect of the totality and its partial relation and interaction. just like the bad man, the evil woman who may seek to do harm or exploit others. and perhaps this has some relation to programming, hidden code, reading signs, literacy. just the fact that it can be acknowledged, perhaps the 'fall of woman' into a state of disgrace even, as an archetypal form that cannot be allowed to exist anymore in the corrupted society and thus she is represented by this deterioration instead. as if 'the symbol' of woman has become her antithesis, by default of a corrupt state.

this involving a corrupted state of being, likewise, for humans in this context. the fracturing of higher self into lower realms of malfunctioning, merely to survive. and thus as context, the opposite of ideal:

   broken male <--> broken female

perhaps disillusionment with reality itself, lack of choices or better options or an incapacitation due to circumstance or unknowing, and then to look across into the life of another and yet still bridge the gap via shared understanding, beyond words. that the life still resides within, there is a shared key between them, and despite everything in surrounding structures that holds them apart, if the love is there and recognized - the shared truth of the encounter and connection between them - then perhaps there is still hope that their relations survives its destruction.

in the profane context, the same dynamic could occur in some sense in terms of prostitution, whereby a secure exchange could be brokered between the two via a structural agreement that establishes their relation, mediated by money, allowing access and connection. and yet it would seem in most cases pseudo-truth (pT) would be the basis for exchange and that this connection is occurring in an unshared context more likely by default, or the circuitry is misaligned in terms of a whole relation as it relates to the emotional bond between beings. and so in some sense the male may be limited and remain in their own interiority, albeit externalized via relation with another, and the female could retain herself within her own boundary, versus having these dimensions harmonized across a total circuit as happens in a grounded relation that develops over time, and thus each person can improve as part of this relation, involving shared commitment though importantly: concern for the others well being not just in the framework of the self though also in their framework, to want what is best for the person and not seek to limit or control it to support only the self.

what is hypothesized is that for a male that is grounded in relation to female consciousness and truly loves women, that even without "money" a currency may exist in this as a shared truth that could be recognized by a woman, and for this example it is to retain the context of a prostitute as a dynamic range such a connection could exist within, of male whose work may seek to support the human connection and her freedom to develop as an individual, and a woman who may recognize the love this involves yet without the money to access or share this secret connection with her.

and thus it is proposed that if this shared truth was recognized, and a particular form of key exchange occurred, that this same situation could be transformed by the transformation of this context of relation, whereby human intimacy could develop via this shared currency of truth, the shared idea, the belief and value, and in turn this could become sacred prostitution by comparison, a real connection between these people that involves shared keys, encrypted communication, shared awareness and grounded relation that verifies the connection. thereby neutralizing exploitation that could be inherent and allowing a new realm of connection based on this shared truth and service and connection, devotion and work and allegiance.

it is to suggest that perhaps it is in the color of clothing in relation to another sign that this communication will occur, or perception of flowers of nature as the realities align, and in this way the aesthetic communication and its basis in life and love have within them this mystery and secret that carries a connection that otherwise may seem absent or entirely profane, and yet the yearning undying heart continues its work and she knows this, and thus it may be an issue of communication and the ability to relate in these terms, not as expectation, yet realization that there may be other dimensionality that is possible, given the right conditions.

again, like equals in some domains, shared connection or understanding or atmosphere that correlates in special moments, this another realm of patterns, shared identity, value, principles, purpose, respect of other views and gaining understanding and knowledge likewise. in this implicit connection, what is shared is truth, what is secured is truth, what is grounded is truth between them.

(that she knows you respect her, what you are doing is for her, that you care for her... that you are not trying to game and exploit her. peer-relation. human. and then perhaps, the hope of balance, the larger truth of this relation between you. such that she too may desire to secure the shared reality and support the males best for her.)

in this way, erotic truth in a context of code and logical reasoning. its role in key exchange, encrypted relations, programming, hidden infrastructures. and of pattern recognition and its relation to ideas, behaviors, and social relations including onesided ideologies, structures and frameworks based on error-reliant biased code.

this proposal then for the currency of erotic truth as a basis for crypto.sex relations, if thoughts and feelings similarly aligned, verified, exchange made accessible via shared agreement, within the defined parameters of relation.

(in most all cases it would be up to her to initiate the potential for intimacy, secretly indicating willingness to relate within shared dimensions via pattern-based communications. are you aware of the codes she communicates within... the aesthetic domain where her insight is supreme, and where truth indeed aligns with beauty)