On 06/04/2016 08:28 PM, juan wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 20:13:17 -0700 Rayzer <rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 06/04/2016 05:56 PM, juan wrote:
I wouldn't describe what I wrote as opinion. No, but it could be described as entirely off-topic of Jacob Appelbaum's departure under seemingly normal circumstances being seized as excuse to (what appears to be) institutionally slander him.
I agree that accusing people of 'sexual misconduct' is a textbook example of slandering, character assassination, witch hunting, etc.
Though it seems that applebaum's own bosses are part of the slandering effort...
That post wasn't there earlier today. Note that it's industry standard boilerplate distancing the org from any liability for NOT mentioning potential problems, but there's absolutely nothing new here and all the 'evidence' is still un-vetted or verified. At least one post I've seen from the twitter account link I posted earlier was obviously not evidence against him, but a visual sexually semantic enticement without relevance to the issue. Perhaps one of the accusers is mentally unstable. Rr Ps. AFA 'working for the gubmint'. DUDE! They didn't even think it was safe to DRAFT me for the Vietnam war... I was threatening to kill the first motherfucker who handed me a gun and I'm MUCH MORE PISSED OFF NOW!
Here's a fact. The smear site is privacy-protected as to ownership but it appears to use github's servers.
http://en.utrace.de/?query=jacobappelbaum.net
Hasn't github been 'compromised'?
Rr