On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:00:25 +0900 Lodewijk andré de la porte <l@odewijk.nl> wrote:
2015-05-28 12:59 GMT+09:00 Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>:
Last time I checked the stuff that can be owned(i. e. property) like say a hamburguer a car or a house, cannot abandon me, destroy me or shape me to its liking.
The joke's on you! Ownership is defined in constitutions, and is not a real thing at all!
Sure. Since your knowlege of legal systems and moral philosophy doesn't go beyond crass, mainstream, legal positivism then your nonsense must be right.
News businesses are supposed to operate in a market environment, meaning that a shitty newscaster will disappear due to market effects. Fox is not disappearing, yet it's exceedingly shitty. What's up? It's also still getting decent views. What's up?
I'd like to to be illegal so that someone can just put an end to the bs.
So there isn't any real standard for property but you think that the government must stop something you don't like on TV? Wait. And you dishonestly ignored the fact I just mentioned. Fox news IS the government. Why would they outlaw themselves? You don't like the real outcome of (your) stupid government theories? =)