-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2016 12:25 AM, juan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:11:51 -0800 Rayzer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
juan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:19:10 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
"When a person drives a car on a highway, he or she agrees to display a license plate," false
Spoken like a true right wing jackass me-first sovereign citizen.
I'll bet you think you're an anarchist too!
Dude. You're the one who quotes doug casey.
As to anarchist, I don't know. You not only quote doug casey but also think that the state owns the highways and the people on it? Oh my...
Anyway, the point I made, though granted, not explicitly, is that 'implied consent' is bullshit. The point goes way over your head perhaps?
As an anarchist, I have no problem recognizing the difference between consent, and making accommodations to coercive demands as a matter of tactical discretion. Calling compliance with arbitrary orders from people who carry guns and radios "consent" is like saying that every person who has ever been raped "was asking for it." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWoHUtAAoJEDZ0Gg87KR0LJOsP/3gcjV6PeA1DWq8ri9zrT/+9 LpFZ5+olV4C+D3xXcOwEAePczCW2S0vYBbPvwLdEoENMcx+qIy9ZKX6D7iTqn86o HVZmpJdg/Sjponmvu+ihUs5XTWlmPew6KSQtcgpp97W4BMahqBWgK63ak6WI9jqD YiOv5NWLry8Cg4nCV8nI1ncCQthgU5wnmCrZ+VFPnZ7R9ApD/m38Xfr9+7QlQp6o Y81l8G4m7xDa3fjGdguENPY49KctMTcnN3r2CEvdjN6G38qL2pWjyDR1ySi1abHb EBtfXTvN3DUGd4tzOXURRH918nSNJAh9/MME3vnX0ecaUFnRz1s2RxI5y7L21GAe ESIioo6WdiBJPAcQnu0jrRiI5IFsHYCnevraO33TyT0BKE625k+6U4VeB9HEhIcz /H6DG7zGTJ51/N1xGgcMdAj6MKNjtxJxFNTTpb2Nl8AZjMZisZU3GBXywAsAjAs9 3QaffrCU+wCw9bJXHRivVcDFwyKmoscGoGgadHW0pY+dOA3K9/bJePoAb4N7PCPE W157q93mijpMCGBGOjB/i01N1UmifkYO9RyOqMEL13pU37sa9Vg7zmkDR7LIMPSj TR2PnhrfHJqg1HUjAn56VhYA7RIKQ39HKXKueWCruk3ePTIHGsnSwUJb8p+N46oS XzkP19CMwjjX4BRGN0cj =d+c8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----