28 May
2014
28 May
'14
11:45 p.m.
My suspicion is that either they were hacked (and had their key stolen), or that they were ordered to shutdown and recommend Microsoft's (presumably backdoored) BitLocker as a replacement. BitLocker's enterprise documentation makes me *incredibly* suspicious that it is susceptible to monitoring by third-parties. Even being embarrassed by whatever bugs the second phase audit uncovered wouldn't explain the sudden recommendation. And why not ecryptfs or ~literally anything else~ ? Pardon my tinfoil hat. ~Griffin