OHAI, As somebody noted in some other thread here lately, "well, that escalated quickly". Dnia czwartek, 9 stycznia 2014 01:41:23 Cari Machet pisze:
1st off if someone is indigenous it is not the same as being native polish > mayb u r ignorant of indigenous information AND if an indigenous person wants to talk about it 2 times on a list i think that is interesting not something to censor i am not interested in censoring or being censored that is one reason i am interested in opensource and you would think that if someone is interested in opensource they would b able to see how that is applicable beyond that of software and the ramifications therein
1. I am "indigenous Polish", how does that make me worse or better than you? 2. I am not censoring anything, simply noting that you have already remarked on you being a "native American" and that I think we all got that. I have no idea why you find it necessary to underline that fact so much, but hey, be my guest. You have the full right to do so -- as I have the right to remark on how unnecessary and completely unrelated to anything discussed in this thread it actually is (I'm sure there are better places to discuss this particular topic).
otherwise i really dont need a daddy but thanks anyway - i find your comments incredibly rude and purposefully degrading and quite the contrary to your last sentence which calls for discussion > i dont think you are modeling any kind of way to be open to discussing at all
M'kay, thanks for sharing.
as for your argument re the road i think it would not hold up in court as the road builder would never be held responsible > so in the US the state certifies roads afterwords so the state agency in the US anyway would be liable so...
Okay, so the party responsible for the road. Fine by me -- in the case of software that would be the party that sub-licenses/sells it further. So not the guy who wrote the code for Microsoft, but Microsoft as the vendor (at least from the end-user perspective).
attacking someones form in an argument is really easy and doesnt show an expansive form from the attacker it just shows they lack a formidable argument and hence they loose credibliity and dont engage ethics which is really sad
On the other hand, requiring the other party to an argument to formulate their thoughts clearly and intelligibly helps the discussion and allows for better understanding, and better argumentation. I fail to see how asking you to write in a more clear manner, especially on a list many subscribers of which are not native English speakers, is an "attack on a form". Can we now please leave the linguistics and nationalities behind us and focus on what could be more aptly considered on-topic here? -- Pozdr rysiek