On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:59:01PM +0800, Nadine Earnshaw wrote:
"True free speech demands that you allow horrible small minded idiots the right to say vile things in public so that all unpopular but valid opinions can be debated and society can grow."
No I don't agree with you. Sorry but you dont get to define what free speech is. In 18c we arent talking about what is unpopular but what is public vilification. There is a difference between debate and personal attacks.Personal attacks whether physical or verbal are not acceptable and are criminal in civilized society.
So where is the quote of Bernard Gaynor, where you say he said something publicly that personally attacked another individual, and that therefore Bernard Gaynor should suffer some legal/ criminal punishment, such as things already done to him (sacking him from the Australian Reserve Army) or some additional/ other punishement he should suffer, as a result??