hence the liberatarian protectionism of old fat white men doing anything they fucking want to whoever the fuck they want no matter what ... THEY ARE WHITE MEN SO... its like a syndicate - WHITE MEN UNITE !!!! KILL EVERYONES SOUL!!!! BECAUSE LIBERATARIANISM!!! On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Cathal (Phone) <cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me
wrote:
It is of course well understood, these days, that paedophilia is exclusively the domain of white men.
On 2 January 2015 17:37:33 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood.
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <
demonfighter@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> > wrote: >> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used >> for > child porn > > If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings > correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related > to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly > not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already > know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them. > > Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I > typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search > engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well > enough.) > > -- > Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209 >
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.