I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design isOn 08/20/2016 12:04 AM, Александр wrote:
> Great news.
>
> For those who have suggested it there's already plans and a roadmap for the
>> fork of Tor. Two concurrent networks which are compatible with a singular
>> browser would greatly diversify the ecosystem and give users more choice.
>> At this point this is the only way forward imo. More info:
>> https://rotorbrowser.com
fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries.
Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be
vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better?